Evaluating process fidelity during the implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Mexico

被引:5
作者
Fuentes-Rivera, Evelyn [1 ]
Heredia-Pi, Ileana [1 ]
Andrade-Romo, Zafiro [1 ]
Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline [1 ]
Bravo, Lourdes [1 ]
Jurkiewicz, Laurie [2 ]
Darney, Blair G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Syst Res, Av Univ 655, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
[2] UCSF, Dept ObGyn & Reprod Sci, SFGH, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, OHSU, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
CenteringPregnancy; Model fidelity; Mexico; Process fidelity; Group antenatal care; G-ANC; Implementation; PRENATAL-CARE; INTERVENTIONS; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05430-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a group antenatal care (G-ANC) model that has proven beneficial for mothers and their newborns. We conducted a feasibility study beginning in 2016 as part of the Mexican effort to implement G-ANC locally. This study reports on fidelity to the essential elements of CP during its implementation in Mexico. Methods We collected prospective data using a standardized checklist at four primary-care centers that implemented our adapted G-ANC model. We performed a descriptive analysis of fidelity to 28 processes per G-ANC session (71 sessions made up of 10 groups and 129 women across 4 health centers). We calculated fidelity to each process as a proportion with 95% confidence intervals. We present overall results and stratified by health center and by facilitation team. Results Overall fidelity to the G-ANC intervention was 82%, with variability by health center (78-88%). The elements with the highest fidelity were having space for activities such as checking vital signs, conversation in a circle, and medical check-ups (100% each) and the element with the lowest fidelity was using music to enhance privacy (27.3%). Fidelity was not significantly different by center. Conclusions Our study suggests good model fidelity during the implementation of G-ANC in Mexico. Our findings also contribute useful information about where to focus efforts in the future to maintain and improve G-ANC model fidelity.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The challenges and opportunities for implementing group antenatal care ('Pregnancy Circles') as part of standard NHS maternity care: A co-designed qualitative study
    Wiseman, O.
    Emmett, L.
    Hickford, G.
    Knight, M.
    Lazar, J.
    Yuill, C.
    McCourt, C.
    MIDWIFERY, 2022, 109
  • [22] Experiential Training Workshops for Group Antenatal Care in Malawi
    Gresh, Ashley
    Abrams, Elizabeth T.
    Chirwa, Ellen
    Jere, Diana L.
    Chodzaza, Elizabeth
    Chorwe-Sungani, Genesis
    Kafulafula, Ursula
    Kapito, Esnath
    Patel, Dhruvi R.
    Jeremiah, Rohan D.
    Klima, Carrie S.
    MacDonald, Amy
    Norr, Kathleen F.
    Patil, Crystal L.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (06) : 759 - 769
  • [23] Building a Global Evidence Base to Guide Policy and Implementation for Group Antenatal Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Key Principles and Research Framework Recommendations from the Global Group Antenatal Care Collaborative
    Grenier, Lindsay
    Lori, Jody R.
    Darney, Blair G.
    Noguchi, Lisa Miyako
    Maru, Sheela
    Klima, Carrie
    Lundeen, Tiffany
    Walker, Dilys
    Patil, Crystal L.
    Suhowatsky, Stephanie
    Musange, Sabine
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 65 (05) : 694 - 699
  • [24] Intervention fidelity and its determinants of focused antenatal care package implementation, in south Wollo zone, Northeast Ethiopia
    Tessema, Asressie Molla
    Gebeyehu, Abebaw
    Mekonnen, Solomon
    Alemu, Kassahun
    Tigabu, Zemene
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [25] Group Prenatal Care in Mexico: perspectives and experiences of health personnel
    Ibanez-Cuevas, Midiam
    Beatriz Heredia-Pi, Ileana
    Fuentes-Rivera, Evelyn
    Andrade-Romo, Zafiro
    Alcalde-Rabanal, Jacqueline
    Cacho, Lourdes Bravo-Bolanos
    Guzman-Delgado, Xochitl
    Jurkiewicz, Laurie
    Darney, Blair G.
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2020, 54 : 1 - 14
  • [26] Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators During Implementation of a Complex Model of Group Prenatal Care in Six Urban Sites
    Novick, Gina
    Womack, Julie A.
    Lewis, Jessica
    Stasko, Emily C.
    Rising, Sharon S.
    Sadler, Lois S.
    Cunningham, Shayna C.
    Tobin, Jonathan N.
    Ickovics, Jeannette R.
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2015, 38 (06) : 462 - 474
  • [27] Long-term cost savings with Centering-based group antenatal care
    Jans, Suze
    Westra, Xanne
    Crone, Matty
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Rijnders, Marlies
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 126
  • [28] Women's experiences of group antenatal care in Australia-the CenteringPregnancy Pilot Study
    Teate, Alison
    Leap, Nicky
    Rising, Sharon Schindler
    Homer, Caroline S. E.
    MIDWIFERY, 2011, 27 (02) : 138 - 145
  • [29] "Taking care of your pregnancy": a mixed-methods study of group antenatal care in Kakamega County, Kenya
    Somji, Aleefia
    Ramsey, Kate
    Dryer, Sean
    Makokha, Fredrick
    Ambasa, Constance
    Aryeh, Brittany
    Booth, Kathleen
    Xueref, Serge
    Moore, Seneca
    Mwenesi, Ralpher
    Rashid, Shafia
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [30] Midwives' views on alcohol guidelines: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to implementation in UK antenatal care
    Scholin, Lisa
    Watson, Julie
    Dyson, Judith
    Smith, Lesley A.
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2021, 29