Production game of multifirms with different decision-making patterns

被引:3
|
作者
Sun Huijun [1 ]
Wu Jianjun [2 ]
Wang Wei [1 ]
Zhang Wenyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, MOE Key Lab Urban Transportat Complex Syst Theory, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Rail Traff Control & Safety, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
Production; Stackelberg game; bilevel programming; sensitivity analysis; NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM; SUPPLY CHAIN; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; COOPERATION; FORMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; COMPETITION; DEMANDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/0954405413486379
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In production market, the decision-making patterns of firms producing a homogeneous kind of products are different. Some are under the control of a dominant firm called centralized pattern. In this case, there is only one decision maker who takes charge of all the firms and attempts to maximize the total utility of the system. Another is decentralized pattern, in which firms plan by themselves. In reality, there always exists a third pattern, where the centralized pattern and decentralized pattern firms are in the same market. This article deals with the last case and studies the effects of decentralized pattern firms' decisions on centralized pattern firms in the same market, which is described as a Stackelberg game. It is supposed that centralized pattern firms are the leaders who affect the whole market by adjusting the production of each firm. Decentralized pattern firms are the followers who determine their productions in a manner of competitive equilibrium against the given centralized firm's strategy. This game in this article is formulated as a bilevel programming model. Solution algorithm based on the sensitivity analysis is adopted to solve the model, and a numerical example is given to illustrate the model and algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1402
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery
    Wilson, Charlie Dee
    Probe, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (23) : E1032 - E1041
  • [32] Impulsivity and rapid decision-making for reward
    Heyes, Stephanie Burnett
    Adam, Robert J.
    Urner, Maren
    van der Leer, Leslie
    Bahrami, Bahador
    Bays, Paul M.
    Husain, Masud
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
  • [33] The role of context in intuitive decision-making
    Elbanna, Said
    Fadol, Yasir
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION, 2016, 22 (05) : 642 - 661
  • [34] Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Zhao, Jun-Hong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09) : 2263 - 2278
  • [35] Evolutionary game of digital decision-making in supply chains based on system dynamics
    Zhao, Dan
    Wang, Xiaofei
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (01) : 475 - 510
  • [36] A DESIGN OF DIGITAL TWINS FOR SUPPORTING DECISION-MAKING IN PRODUCTION LOGISTICS
    Jeong, Yongkuk
    Flores-Garcia, Erik
    Wiktorsson, Magnus
    2020 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2020, : 2683 - 2694
  • [37] A calculus of probability or belief? Neural underpinnings of social decision-making in a card game
    Chen, Yibei
    Youk, Sungbin
    Wang, Paula T.
    Pinti, Paola
    Weber, Rene
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2023, 188
  • [38] Cooperation and Competition Strategy Analysis of Decision-Making Units Based on Efficiency Game
    Cao, Li
    Ma, Zhanxin
    Muren
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 29 (02): : 235 - 248
  • [39] EXPERIMENTAL "BEAUTY CONTEST" GAME AND SIMULTANEOUS DECISION-MAKING WITHIN VARIOUS GROUPS
    Rymanov, Alexander
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2018, 2018, : 57 - 64
  • [40] Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed, Mike
    Wilkinson, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)