Production game of multifirms with different decision-making patterns

被引:3
|
作者
Sun Huijun [1 ]
Wu Jianjun [2 ]
Wang Wei [1 ]
Zhang Wenyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, MOE Key Lab Urban Transportat Complex Syst Theory, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Rail Traff Control & Safety, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
Production; Stackelberg game; bilevel programming; sensitivity analysis; NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM; SUPPLY CHAIN; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; COOPERATION; FORMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; COMPETITION; DEMANDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/0954405413486379
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In production market, the decision-making patterns of firms producing a homogeneous kind of products are different. Some are under the control of a dominant firm called centralized pattern. In this case, there is only one decision maker who takes charge of all the firms and attempts to maximize the total utility of the system. Another is decentralized pattern, in which firms plan by themselves. In reality, there always exists a third pattern, where the centralized pattern and decentralized pattern firms are in the same market. This article deals with the last case and studies the effects of decentralized pattern firms' decisions on centralized pattern firms in the same market, which is described as a Stackelberg game. It is supposed that centralized pattern firms are the leaders who affect the whole market by adjusting the production of each firm. Decentralized pattern firms are the followers who determine their productions in a manner of competitive equilibrium against the given centralized firm's strategy. This game in this article is formulated as a bilevel programming model. Solution algorithm based on the sensitivity analysis is adopted to solve the model, and a numerical example is given to illustrate the model and algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:1393 / 1402
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring the Importance of Decision-Making Criteria in Biofuel Production Technology Selection
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Mahdi Rezaie, Fariba
    Rezaei, Jafar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2021, 68 (02) : 483 - 497
  • [2] The dynamics of competition and decision-making
    Morgan, Andrew J.
    Neal, Andrew
    Ballard, Timothy
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2024, 31 (06) : 2811 - 2822
  • [3] The levee dilemma game: A game experiment on flood management decision-making
    Liao, Kuei-Hsien
    Chiang, Yen-Sheng
    Chan, Jeffrey Kok Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 90
  • [4] The potential use of game theory in decision-making in CHD
    Francis, Jeevan
    Prothasis, Sneha
    Ganesh, Ayalvadi
    Ekkunagul, Thanapon
    Stoica, Serban
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2024, 34 (07) : 1424 - 1431
  • [5] Locational Decision-Making and Representational Impacts
    Cho, Seonga
    Murray, Alan T.
    Dodge, Somayeh
    Church, Richard L.
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 2025, 77 (02) : 121 - 135
  • [6] Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review
    Huang, Yunhan
    Zhu, Quanyan
    DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 12 (01) : 7 - 48
  • [7] Decision-making on multi-mould maintenance in production scheduling
    Wong, C. S.
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    Chung, S. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (19) : 5640 - 5655
  • [8] Model for decision-making in agricultural production planning
    Cardin-Pedrosa, Marta
    Jose Alvarez-Lopez, Carlos
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 82 : 87 - 95
  • [9] Comparison of Manual and Automated Decision-Making with a Logistics Serious Game
    Mes, Martijn
    van Heeswijk, Wouter
    COMPUTATIONAL LOGISTICS, ICCL 2020, 2020, 12433 : 698 - 714
  • [10] Giving According to Preferences Decision-making in the Group Dictator Game
    Franzen, Axel
    Pointner, Sonja
    SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2014, 65 (02): : 139 - 152