The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink

被引:0
作者
Janson, Jolanda [1 ]
Thorne, Jeremy D. [1 ]
Kranczioch, Cornelia [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Neuropsychol Lab, Dept Psychol, European Med Sch, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
attentional blink; attentional capture; attention; novelty; contingent capture; rapid serial visual presentation; TASK; DIFFICULTY; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/WNR.0000000000000098
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The attentional blink (AB) occurs when the limits of temporal processing are reached. In a typical AB experiment, two targets (T1, T2) are presented within a stream of distracters, and detection of T2 is impaired when presented shortly after T1. Several theories focus on the mechanism underlying this deficit, among them proposals that see the similarity between distracters and targets as a crucial factor. The present study aimed to gain a better understanding of the effect of distracter stream properties on performance in the AB paradigm. A skeletal AB task was combined with a pretarget distracter stream. The presence and familiarity of the distracter stream and its similarityto the targets were manipulated in three separate experiments. The last distracter before T1 was sufficient to impair T1 detection in the standard rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm. Second, T2|T1 performance was impaired by an RSVP stream with low target-distracter similarity but unfamiliar stimuli. Finally, a single mask before T1 was shown to impair T2|T1. The results suggest that it is the last distracter before T1, rather than the RSVP stream per se, that impairs T1 detection performance. T2|T1 performance is influenced by a combination of transient attentional capture mechanisms that include but are not limited to target-distracter similarity. Thus, the size of an AB is determined not only by target-distracter similarity but by the overall processing demands of the distracters.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 334
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF ATTENTIONAL DWELL TIME IN HUMAN VISION
    DUNCAN, J
    WARD, R
    SHAPIRO, K
    [J]. NATURE, 1994, 369 (6478) : 313 - 315
  • [2] The attentional blink: A review of data and theory
    Dux, Paul E.
    Marois, Rane
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2009, 71 (08) : 1683 - 1700
  • [3] Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink
    Folk, CL
    Leber, AB
    Egeth, HE
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (05): : 741 - 753
  • [4] Focal distraction: Spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture
    Ghorashi, SMS
    Zuvic, SM
    Visser, TAW
    Di Lollo, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (01) : 78 - 91
  • [5] The attentional blink: Past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness
    Martens, Sander
    Wyble, Brad
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2010, 34 (06) : 947 - 957
  • [6] The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink
    Olivers, CNL
    Nieuwenhuis, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2006, 32 (02) : 364 - 379
  • [7] TEMPORARY SUPPRESSION OF VISUAL PROCESSING IN AN RSVP TASK - AN ATTENTIONAL BLINK
    RAYMOND, JE
    SHAPIRO, KL
    ARNELL, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (03) : 849 - 860
  • [8] Resource sharing in the attentional blink
    Shapiro, K
    Schmitz, F
    Martens, S
    Hommel, B
    Schnitzler, A
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2006, 17 (02) : 163 - 166
  • [9] Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink
    Visser, TA
    Bischof, WF
    Di Lollo, V
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (08): : 1418 - 1432
  • [10] Data-limited manipulations of T1 difficulty modulate the attentional blink
    Visser, Troy A. W.
    Ohan, Jeneva L.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2007, 61 (02): : 102 - 108