Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery

被引:46
作者
Dutton, Thomas J. [1 ]
McGrath, John S. [1 ]
Daugherty, Mark O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Exeter Surg Hlth Serv Res Unit, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
关键词
rectus sheath catheters; open pelvic surgery; analgesia; POSTOPERATIVE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; ABDOMINAL-SURGERY; RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; OLD TECHNIQUE; COMPLICATIONS; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; RESECTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12316
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To report on the safety and efficacy of rectus sheath blocks, topped-up' using bilateral rectus sheath catheters (RSCs), in patients undergoing major open urological surgery. Methods The RSCs were inserted under ultrasound guidance into 200 patients between April 2008 and August 2011, of whom 106 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and 94 underwent open radical cystectomy (ORC). A retrospective case-note review was undertaken. Outcomes included technical success and complication rates of the insertion and use of RSC, visual analogue pain scores, additional analgesia requirements and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results All RSCs were successfully placed without complication and used for a mean of 3.6 days for ORC and 2.1 days for RRP. Early removal occurred in 6.49% of patients. Low overall pain scores were reported in both groups. Patients were more likely to require a patient-controlled analgesia system in the ORC group but the overall need for additional analgesia was low in both groups, reducing significantly after the initial 24h. In combination with an enhanced recovery programme, LOS reduced from 17.0 to 10.8 days in the ORC group and from 6.2 to 2.8 days in the RRP group. Conclusion The use of RSCs appears to offer an effective and safe method of peri-operative analgesia in patients undergoing major open urological pelvic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 253
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Introduction of an enhanced recovery protocol for radical cystectomy [J].
Arumainayagam, Nimalan ;
McGrath, John ;
Jefferson, Kieran P. ;
Gillatt, David A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (06) :698-701
[2]   Anesthetic technique for radical prostatectomy surgery affects cancer recurrence - A retrospective analysis [J].
Biki, Barbara ;
Mascha, Edward ;
Moriarty, Denis C. ;
Fitzpatrick, John M. ;
Sessler, Daniel I. ;
Buggy, Donal J. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 109 (02) :180-187
[3]   Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia - A meta-analysis [J].
Block, BM ;
Liu, SS ;
Rowlingson, AJ ;
Cowan, AR ;
Cowan, JA ;
Wu, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (18) :2455-2463
[4]   A Comparison of Postoperative Complications in Open versus Robotic Cystectomy [J].
Casey, K. Ng ;
Kauffman, Eric C. ;
Lee, Ming-Ming ;
Otto, Brandon J. ;
Portnoff, Alyse ;
Ehrlich, Josh R. ;
Schwartz, Michael J. ;
Wang, Gerald J. ;
Scherr, Douglas S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (02) :274-281
[5]   Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: Results of a collaborative care pathway [J].
Chang, SS ;
Cookson, MS ;
Baumgartner, RG ;
Wells, N ;
Smith, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :2012-2016
[6]   Major complications of epidural analgesia after surgery: results of a six-year survey [J].
Christie, I. W. ;
McCabe, S. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (04) :335-341
[7]   Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after upper abdominal surgery [J].
Cornish, Philip ;
Deacon, Alf .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (1-2) :84-84
[8]   POSTOPERATIVE EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE-MORPHINE THERAPY - EXPERIENCE WITH 4,227 SURGICAL CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
DELEONCASASOLA, OA ;
PARKER, B ;
LEMA, MJ ;
HARRISON, P ;
MASSEY, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (02) :368-375
[9]   Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritis, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data [J].
Dolin, SJ ;
Cashman, JN .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (05) :584-591
[10]   The rectus sheath block in paediatric anaesthesia: New indications for an old technique? [J].
Ferguson, S ;
Thomas, V ;
Lewis, I .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 6 (06) :463-466