Maintenance therapy with calcium channel blockers for preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour

被引:23
作者
Gaunekar, Naguesh Naik [1 ]
Raman, Puvaneswary [2 ,3 ]
Bain, Emily [3 ]
Crowther, Caroline A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mater Med Ctr, Mackay, Qld 4740, Australia
[2] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Womens & Babies Div, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Obstet & Gynaecol, Robinson Inst, ARCH Australian Res Ctr Hlth Women & Babies, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Auckland, Liggins Inst, Auckland 1, New Zealand
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2013年 / 10期
关键词
MAGNESIUM-SULFATE; ORAL NIFEDIPINE; RITODRINE; TOCOLYSIS; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; PLACEBO; FETAL; SUPPRESSION; NICARDIPINE;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD004071.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Calcium channel blocker maintenance therapy is one of the types of tocolytic therapy that may be used after an episode of threatened preterm labour (and usually an initial dose of tocolytic therapy) in an attempt to prevent the onset of further preterm contractions. Objectives To assess the effects of calcium channel blockers as maintenance therapy on preventing preterm birth after threatened preterm labour. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2013) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials of calcium channel blockers used as maintenance therapy to prevent preterm birth after threatened preterm labour, compared with placebo or no treatment. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Main results We included six trials that enrolled 794 women and their babies and all assessed nifedipine as calcium channel blocker maintenance therapy. The six trials were judged to be at a moderate risk of bias overall. No differences in the incidence of preterm birth (risk ratio (RR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.09; five trials, 681 women), birth within 48 hours of treatment (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.07 to 3.00; two trials, 128 women) or neonatal mortality (average RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.05 to 11.76; two trials, 133 infants) were seen when nifedipine maintenance therapy was compared with placebo or no treatment. No stillbirths were reported in the one trial that provided data for this outcome. No trials reported on longer-term follow-up of infants. Women receiving nifedipine maintenance therapy were significantly more likely to have their pregnancy prolonged (mean difference (MD) 5.35 days; 95% CI 0.49 to 10.21; four trials, 275 women); however, no differences between groups were shown for birth at less than 34 weeks' gestation, birth at less than 28 weeks' gestation, birth within seven days of treatment, or gestational age at birth. No significant differences were shown between the nifedipine and control groups for any of the secondary neonatal morbidities reported. Similarly, no significant differences were seen for the outcomes relating to the use of health services, except for in one trial, where infants whose mothers received nifedipine were significantly more likely to have a longer length of hospital stay as compared with infants born to mothers who received a placebo (MD 14.00 days; 95% CI 4.21 to 23.79; 60 infants). Authors' conclusions Based on the current available evidence, maintenance treatment with a calcium channel blocker after threatened preterm labour does not prevent preterm birth or improve maternal or infant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:41
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Outcomes of extremely low-birth-weight infants between 500 and 750 g
    Agustines, LA
    Lin, YG
    Rumney, PJ
    Lu, MC
    Bonebrake, R
    Asrat, T
    Nageotte, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) : 1113 - 1116
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, REV MAN REVMAN 5 2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, COMMUNICATION
  • [4] Tocolytic treatment for the management of preterm labor: A review of the evidence
    Berkman, ND
    Thorp, JM
    Lohr, KN
    Carey, TS
    Hartmann, KE
    Gavin, NI
    Hasselblad, V
    Idicula, AE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1648 - 1659
  • [5] COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE AND RITODRINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR
    BRACERO, LA
    LEIKIN, E
    KIRSHENBAUM, N
    TEJANI, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (06) : 365 - 369
  • [6] Bracero LA, 1990, 10 ANN M SOC PER OBS, P77
  • [7] Maintenance oral nifedipine for preterm labor: A randomized clinical trial
    Carr, DB
    Clark, AL
    Kernek, K
    Spinnato, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) : 822 - 827
  • [8] Clarke M., 2003, COCHRANE LIB
  • [9] *COCHR COLL, 2003, REV MAN REVMAN COMP
  • [10] Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour
    Dodd, Jodie M.
    Crowther, Caroline A.
    Middleton, Philippa
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12):