Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?

被引:50
作者
Celi, Monica [1 ]
Rao, Cecilia [1 ]
Scialdoni, Alessandro [1 ]
Tempesta, Valerio [1 ]
Gasbarra, Elena [1 ]
Pistillo, Pietro [1 ]
Tarantino, Umberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Policlin Tor Vergata Fdn, I-00133 Rome, Italy
关键词
Bone mineral density; Osteoporosis; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Fracture risk; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; LUMBAR SPINE; DIAGNOSIS; DENSITOMETRY; FRACTURES; WOMEN; HIP;
D O I
10.1007/s40520-013-0074-1
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis is a diffuse skeletal disease in which a decrease in bone strength leads to an increased risk of fractures. A wide variety of types of bone densitometry measurements are available, including quantitative computed tomography measurements of the spine, quantitative ultrasound devices for measurements of the heel and other peripheral sites and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, forearm and total body scans. Compared with alternative bone densitometry techniques, hip and spine DXA examinations have a number of advantages that include a consensus that BMD results can be interpreted using the World Health Organization T score definition of osteoporosis, a proven ability to predict fracture risk, proven effectiveness at targeting anti-fracture therapies, and the ability to monitor response to treatment. However, in recent years, the authors have raised some important questions about the objective limits of this method that have led to doubts about its effectiveness in terms of clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:S47 / S49
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Andreoli A, 2011, RADIOL MED
  • [2] [Anonymous], JAMA
  • [3] Discriminative ability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry site selection in identifying patients with osteoporotic fractures
    Arabi, Asma
    Baddoura, Rafic
    Awada, Hassane
    Khoury, Nabil
    Haddad, Souha
    Ayoub, Ghazi
    El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ghada
    [J]. BONE, 2007, 40 (04) : 1060 - 1065
  • [4] The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Blake, Glen M.
    Fogelman, Ignac
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (03) : 406 - 414
  • [5] Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength
    Bouxsein, Mary L.
    Seeman, Ego
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 23 (06): : 741 - 753
  • [6] DXA parameters: Beyond bone mineral density
    Briot, Karine
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2013, 80 (03) : 265 - 269
  • [7] The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis
    de Klerk, Gijs
    van der Velde, D.
    van der Palen, J.
    van Bergeijk, L.
    Hegeman, J. H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2009, 129 (02) : 251 - 257
  • [8] Fogelman I, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P2015
  • [9] Hamdy Ronald C, 2002, J Clin Densitom, V5 Suppl, pS11, DOI 10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S11
  • [10] International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), 2005, OFF POS INT SOC CLIN