Re-evaluating selective screening criteria for chlamydial infection among women in the US Pacific Northwest

被引:26
作者
La Montagne, DS
Patrick, LE
Fine, DN
Marrazzo, JM
机构
[1] Ctr Communicable Dis Surveillance, Hlth Protect Agcy, London, England
[2] Ctr Hlth Training, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Infect Dis, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.OLQ.0000124613.85111.6B
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Screening women for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection using selective screening criteria has been operational in the northwestern United States (Region X) since 1988. Changes in the field, including declines in CT prevalence, introduction of sensitive laboratory tests, and budgetary pressures necessitate reevaluating the selective screening approach to ensure program credibility and efficiency. Goals: The goals of this study were to assess 1) performance of screening criteria in Region X, 2) predictors of CT infection, and 3) optimization of these criteria. Study Design: We conducted cross-sectional analysis of 409,882 CT test records of women from 1998 to 2000 using multivariate logistic regression and sensitivity and efficiency analyses. Results: Young age ( < 25 yrs), cervical signs of infection, and recent exposure to or history of chlamydial infection were strongly associated with testing positive. Behavioral risks showed a weak association with infection. Currently used selective screening criteria were sensitive but not efficient. Criteria weighted toward young age, exposure to chlamydia, or cervicitis would increase criteria efficiency by nearly 25% in some settings while detecting > 90% of infections. Conclusion: Evaluating selective screening criteria can result in modifications that could increase screening efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Women for Chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics - The cost-effectiveness of DNA amplification assays [J].
Howell, MR ;
Quinn, TC ;
Brathwaite, W ;
Gaydos, CA .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1998, 25 (02) :108-117
[22]  
KRETZSCHMAR M, 2001, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V153, P90
[23]  
Lossick J, 1990, CHLAMYDIAL INFECTION, P575
[24]  
MABEY DCW, 1985, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V63, P1107
[25]   Performance and cost-effectiveness of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women - Implications for a national chlamydia control strategy [J].
Marrazzo, JM ;
Celum, CL ;
Hillis, SD ;
Fine, D ;
Delisle, S ;
Handsfield, H .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1997, 24 (03) :131-141
[26]   Selective screening for chlamydial infection in women: A comparison of three sets of criteria [J].
Marrazzo, JM ;
Fine, D ;
Celum, CL ;
DeLisle, S ;
Handsfield, HH .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 29 (04) :158-162
[27]   15-MONTH FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF WOMEN INFECTED WITH CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS [J].
MCCORMACK, WM ;
ALPERT, S ;
MCCOMB, DE ;
NICHOLS, RL ;
SEMINE, DZ ;
ZINNER, SH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 300 (03) :123-125
[28]   Trends in the prevalence of chlamydial infections - The impact of community-wide testing [J].
Mertz, KJ ;
Levine, WC ;
Mosure, DJ ;
Berman, SM ;
Dorian, KJ .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1997, 24 (03) :169-175
[29]  
MIETTINEN A, 1990, SEX TRANSM DIS, V17, P10
[30]   Selective screening for chlamydial infection: Which criteria to use? [J].
Miller, WC ;
Hoffman, IF ;
Owen-O'Dowd, J ;
McPherson, JT ;
Privette, A ;
Schmitz, JL ;
Woodlief, G ;
Leone, PA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (02) :115-122