Visualizing Evolution of Knowledge Management Capability in Construction Firms

被引:32
作者
Chen, Le [1 ,2 ]
Fong, Patrick S. W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Sci & Engn, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Dynamic capabilities; Learning mechanisms; Knowledge management; Performance evaluation; System dynamics modeling; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; MICROFOUNDATIONS; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION; ORGANIZATION; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY; FORM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000649
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A firm, as a dynamic, evolving, and quasi-autonomous system of knowledge production and application, develops knowledge management capability (KMC) through strategic learning to sustain competitive advantages in a dynamic environment. Knowledge governance mechanisms and knowledge processes connect and interact with each other, thereby forming learning mechanisms that execute double-loop learning. This in turn drives the genesis and evolution of KMC to modify operating routines that contribute to the desired performance. This paper reports a study that was performed within a context of construction contractors, a type of project-based firm, which operates within the dynamic Hong Kong construction market. The writers used a multiple-case design to incorporate evidence from the literature and interviews, with the help of system dynamics modeling, to visualize the evolution of KMC. The writers' paper demonstrates the feasibility of visualizing how a firm's KMC correlates with its operating environment over time. The findings imply that knowledge management (KM) applications can be better planned and controlled through evaluation of KM performance over time from a capability perspective. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 851
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links [J].
Abell, Peter ;
Felin, Teppo ;
Foss, Nicolai .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2008, 29 (06) :489-502
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BUSINESS DYNAMICS SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, STRATEGY LEADERSHIP
[4]  
[Anonymous], ITHINK 9 1 4
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES
[6]  
Barney J.B., 2007, GAINING SUSTAINING C, V3rd
[7]   Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications [J].
Barratt, Mark ;
Choi, Thomas Y. ;
Li, Mei .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (04) :329-342
[8]  
Bee-Lan Oo, 2008, International Journal of Project Management, V26, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.001
[9]   Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors [J].
Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje ;
van den Ende, Jan .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (04) :545-561
[10]  
Carlile P.R, 2009, CYCLES THEORY BUILDI