Sensory-processing sensitivity versus the sensory-processing theory: Convergence and divergence

被引:11
作者
Turjeman-Levi, Yaara [1 ]
Kluger, Avraham N. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Hebrew Univ, Business Sch, Jerusalem, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
sensory-processing sensitivity; adolescent adult sensory profile; exploratory graph analysis; neuroticism; validity; ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE; INTERACTION ANXIETY SCALE; SOCIAL PHOBIA; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION; TEMPERAMENT TRAIT; TURKISH VERSION; SHORT FORMS; NEUROTICISM; STRESS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010836
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two individual-difference theories focus on sensory sensitivity: one emanating from psychology-sensory-processing-sensitivity (SPS); and one from occupational therapy-sensory processing theory (SP). Each theory is coupled with its measure: the highly-sensitive-person scale (HSPS) and the adolescent adult sensory profile (ASP). The constructs of both theories were claimed to be independent of neuroticism. To assess the convergence of these measures, we recruited participants from a general population and a Facebook Group dedicated to people high in SPS. The participants, N = 1,702 M-age = 26.9 (66.7% female), answered the HSPS, ASP, and neuroticism questionnaires. We subjected the HSPS and the APS to exploratory graph analysis. To assess the divergence of these measures from neuroticism, we performed meta-analyses. We also used a subsample obtained in an unrelated study, N = 490, to correlate HSPS and APS with the Big Five and additional measures. The results suggested that (a) the latent structure of these measures conforms to the theories only partially, (b) some of the sub-scales of these two measures correlated highly, r = 0.63, but low enough to suggest divergence, (c) both differentially predict membership in a Facebook group, and (d) both are not isomorphic with neuroticism. We concluded that HSPS primarily measures the emotional reaction to sensory stimulation, whereas ASP the behavioral reactions. We offer shorter yet reliable measures for both theories.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 134 条
[21]   Beyond Diathesis Stress: Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences [J].
Belsky, Jay ;
Pluess, Michael .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2009, 135 (06) :885-908
[22]  
Ben-Avi N., 2012, Psychology, V3, P70, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31012
[23]   The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports [J].
Benham, G .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (07) :1433-1440
[24]   Gender effects on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults, revisited [J].
Biederman, J ;
Faraone, SV ;
Monuteaux, MC ;
Bober, M ;
Cadogen, E .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 55 (07) :692-700
[25]   Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction [J].
Booth, Charlotte ;
Standage, Helen ;
Fox, Elaine .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 87 :24-29
[26]  
Borenstein M., 2021, Introduction to Meta-Analysis, DOI 10.1002/9781119558378
[27]   Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity [J].
Boyce, WT ;
Ellis, BJ .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 17 (02) :271-301
[28]   Is the relationship between sensory-processing sensitivity and negative affect mediated by emotional regulation? [J].
Brindle, Kimberley ;
Moulding, Richard ;
Bakker, Kaitlyn ;
Nedeljkovic, Maja .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) :214-221
[29]   The adult sensory profile: Measuring patterns of sensory processing [J].
Brown, C ;
Tollefson, N ;
Dunn, W ;
Cromwell, R ;
Filion, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2001, 55 (01) :75-82
[30]  
Brown C., 2010, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY