Multi-stage and multi-objective decision-support tool for biopharmaceutical drug product manufacturing: Equipment technology evaluation

被引:12
作者
Zurcher, Philipp [1 ,2 ]
Shirahata, Haruku [1 ]
Badr, Sara [1 ]
Sugiyama, Hirokazu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Dept Chem Syst Engn, Bunkyo Ku, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Chem & Bioengn, Vladimir Prelog Weg 1, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Sterile filling; Single-use technology; Parenterals; Sensitivity analysis; Decision-making; Changeover processes; SINGLE-USE SYSTEMS; TRENDS; INDUSTRY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2020.07.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The emergence of single use technology (SUT) for equipment promises to be a revolutionary change in biopharmaceutical production. SUT equipment reduces non-value adding working time and provides operational flexibility. However, there are increased process risks such as possible contamination with leachable compounds or supply dependencies, as well as required redesign efforts. This work provides a multi-stage approach for decision-support for optimal equipment technology applied in a case study for a sterile filling line. Three design stages are identified. The first two stages explore the design landscape using the economic performance to show the general trends of favorable regions for equipment technology and the sensitivity to process parameters according to their relative importance. The last stage is more detailed but incorporates additional assessment indicators such as environmental impact and risks of process downtime. From an economic perspective SUT options are more favorable for short term and small-scale production, such as the case for preparing drugs for clinical trials. Traditional stainless-steel options had a significant economic advantage at large scale and long term production. The ranking of favorable options varied as other assessment factors, namely life-cycle CO2 emissions as well as risks in contamination and supply delay, were included in the analysis. The proposed methodology offers an agile decision-making tool, accounts for uncertainties across various design phases, and offers a systematic exploration of the available design landscape. (C) 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 252
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization of anti-typhoon evacuation strategy for riser with new hang-off system
    Li, Yan-Wei
    Liu, Xiu-Quan
    Hu, Peng-Ji
    Hu, Xiao-Yu
    Chang, Yuan-Jiang
    Chen, Guo-Ming
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2025, 22 (01) : 457 - 471
  • [32] A probability constrained multi-objective optimization model for CCHP system operation decision support
    Hu, Mengqi
    Cho, Heejin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 116 : 230 - 242
  • [33] Multi-objective optimization of product variety and manufacturing complexity in mixed-model assembly systems
    Wang, He
    Zhu, Xiaowei
    Wang, Hui
    Hu, S. Jack
    Lin, Zhongqin
    Chen, Guanlong
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2011, 30 (01) : 16 - 27
  • [34] DYNAMIC JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND OPTIMAL STRATEGY OF MULTI-OBJECTIVE MULTI PERIOD MULTI-STAGE REVERSE LOGISTICS NETWORK: A CASE STUDY OF LEAD BATTERY IN SHANGHAI
    Guo, Jianquan
    Fang Jiang
    Gen, Mitsuo
    28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM2018): GLOBAL INTEGRATION OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING AND SMART INDUSTRY FOR GOOD OF HUMANITY, 2018, 17 : 1171 - 1178
  • [35] Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality
    Ascione, Fabrizio
    Bianco, Nicola
    De Stasio, Claudio
    Mauro, Gerardo Maria
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 174 : 37 - 68
  • [36] Four E analysis and multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants integrated with Multi-stage Flash (MSF) desalination unit
    Sanaye, Sepehr
    Asgari, Saeid
    DESALINATION, 2013, 320 : 105 - 117
  • [37] An analysis of multi-objective evaluation and decision-making models for risk investment projects
    Zhou, Ziyu
    Cao, Yukun
    Xing, Jijun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-RISK MANAGEMENT (ICERM 2008), 2008, : 32 - 40
  • [38] A novel multi-objective decision support method for ship energy systems synthesis to enhance sustainability
    Trivyza, Nikoletta L.
    Rentizelas, Athanasios
    Theotokatos, Gerasimos
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 168 : 128 - 149
  • [39] An Efficient Framework for Multi-Objective Risk-Informed Decision Support Systems for Drainage Rehabilitation
    Cai, Xiatong
    Mohammadian, Abdolmajid
    Shirkhani, Hamidreza
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL APPLICATIONS, 2020, 25 (04)
  • [40] A Multi-objective Decision Support System for Simulation and Optimization of Municipal Solid Waste Management System
    Yu, H.
    Solvang, W. D.
    Yuan, S.
    3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM 2012), 2012, : 193 - 199