Computer-Assisted Annotation of Digital H&E/SOX10 Dual Stains Generates High-Performing Convolutional Neural Network for Calculating Tumor Burden in H&E-Stained Cutaneous Melanoma

被引:5
|
作者
Nielsen, Patricia Switten [1 ,2 ]
Georgsen, Jeanette Baehr [1 ,2 ]
Vinding, Mads Sloth [2 ,3 ]
Ostergaard, Lasse Riis [4 ]
Steiniche, Torben [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 35, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 82, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Ctr Funct Integrat Neurosci, Palle Juul Jensens Blvd 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7E, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
deep learning; artificial intelligence; digital pathology; melanoma; immunohistochemistry; H&E; SOX10; IHC-supervised annotation; digital multiple stains; tumor burden; AUTOMATED QUANTIFICATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; SOX10; EXPRESSION; BRAF MUTATIONS; BREAST-CANCER; KI-67; INDEXES; SEGMENTATION; PATHOLOGISTS; PROPORTION;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192114327
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Deep learning for the analysis of H&E stains requires a large annotated training set. This may form a labor-intensive task involving highly skilled pathologists. We aimed to optimize and evaluate computer-assisted annotation based on digital dual stains of the same tissue section. H&E stains of primary and metastatic melanoma (N = 77) were digitized, re-stained with SOX10, and re-scanned. Because images were aligned, annotations of SOX10 image analysis were directly transferred to H&E stains of the training set. Based on 1,221,367 annotated nuclei, a convolutional neural network for calculating tumor burden (CNNTB) was developed. For primary melanomas, precision of annotation was 100% (95%CI, 99% to 100%) for tumor cells and 99% (95%CI, 98% to 100%) for normal cells. Due to low or missing tumor-cell SOX10 positivity, precision for normal cells was markedly reduced in lymph-node and organ metastases compared with primary melanomas (p < 0.001). Compared with stereological counts within skin lesions, mean difference in tumor burden was 6% (95%CI, -1% to 13%, p = 0.10) for CNNTB and 16% (95%CI, 4% to 28%, p = 0.02) for pathologists. Conclusively, the technique produced a large annotated H&E training set with high quality within a reasonable timeframe for primary melanomas and subcutaneous metastases. For these lesion types, the training set generated a high-performing CNNTB, which was superior to the routine assessments of pathologists.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据