Occurrence and microbial degradation of fipronil residues in tropical highland rhizosphere soils of Kerala, India

被引:11
作者
At, Keerthi [1 ]
Karthikeyan, Subburamu [2 ]
Thanga, Salom Gnana, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kerala, Dept Environm Sci, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
[2] Tamilnadu Agr Univ, Dept Bioenergy, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION | 2019年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
Fipronil residue; microbial degradation; Staphylococcus arlettae; Bacillus thuringiensis; FIELD; DISSIPATION; 2,4-D; PH;
D O I
10.1080/15320383.2019.1578336
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of the current study was to analyze the abundance and activity of soil microflora in response to fipronil residues, as well as conjointly to isolate and identify bacteria for the bioremediation of fipronil contaminated soils in the cardamom plantations of Idukki district, Kerala. Soil samples collected from rhizosphere areas of six completely different cardamom plantations were analyzed for fipronil residues, physicochemical properties, biochemical properties, and microbial abundance. Biodegradation studies using isolated bacteria were done both in liquid medium and in soil microcosm fortified with fipronil. Fipronil residues were detected in all sampling sites. Canonical correlation analysis revealed that the influence of fipronil on soil physicochemical properties was more pronounced than that on soil microbial properties. The presence of fipronil residues in the soil did not adversely affect bacterial abundance and activity. Two bacterial strains Staphylococcus arlettae and Bacillus thuringiensis could degrade fipronil in both liquid culture and soil. Paired sample T-test and degradation kinetic study recorded that the bacterial strain S. arlettae was more efficient (81.94%) in fipronil degradation than B. thuringiensis (65.98%). The results revealed the potential for in situ bioremediation of fipronil contaminated soil by bioaugmentation using efficient bacterial isolates.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 379
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ANDERSON J. P. E., 1982, METHODS SOIL ANAL, V2, P831, DOI 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c41
[2]   PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS [J].
ANDERSON, JPE ;
DOMSCH, KH .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1978, 10 (03) :215-221
[3]  
ANDERSON TA, 1995, PROG IND M, V32, P205
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PRACTICAL MICROBIOLO
[5]   Effects of combination of plant and microorganism on degradation of simazine in soil [J].
Liao Min ;
Xie Xiaomei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 20 (02) :195-198
[6]  
Anudurga G., 2017, 3 BIOTECH, V212, P1
[7]  
Avhik Bishnu Avhik Bishnu, 2009, World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V5, P690
[8]  
Balagopalan M., 1995, Journal of Tropical Forest Science, V8, P161
[9]   Bound residues: environmental solution or future problem? [J].
Barraclough, D ;
Kearney, T ;
Croxford, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2005, 133 (01) :85-90
[10]   EFFECT OF HERBICIDES BUTACHLOR, 2,4-D AND OXYFLUORFEN ON ENZYME-ACTIVITIES AND CO2 EVOLUTION IN SUBMERGED PADDY FIELD SOIL [J].
BARUAH, M ;
MISHRA, RR .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1986, 96 (02) :287-291