AN INVESTIGATION OF TREATING ADIABATIC WALL TEMPERATURE AS THE DRIVING TEMPERATURE IN FILM COOLING STUDIES

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Lei [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Energy Convers & Conservat Ctr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2011, VOL 5, PTS A AND B | 2012年
关键词
HEAT-TRANSFER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In film cooling heat transfer analysis, one of the core concepts is to deem film cooled adiabatic wall temperature (T-aw) as the driving potential for the actual heat flux over the film-cooled surface. Theoretically, the concept of treating T-aw as the driving temperature potential is drawn from compressible flow theory when viscous dissipation becomes the heat source near the wall and creates higher wall temperature than in the flowing gas. But in conditions where viscous dissipation is negligible, which is common in experiments under laboratory conditions, the heat source is not from near the wall but from the main hot gas stream; therefore, the concept of treating the adiabatic wall temperature as the driving potential is subjected to examination. To help investigate the role that T-aw plays, a series of computational simulations are conducted under typical film cooling conditions over a conjugate wall with internal flow cooling. The result and analysis support the validity of this concept to be used in the film cooling by showing that T-aw is indeed the driving temperature potential on the hypothetical zero wall thickness condition, ie. T-aw is always higher than T-w with underneath (or internal) cooling and the adiabatic film heat transfer coefficient (h(af)) is always positive. However, in the conjugate wall cases, T-aw is not always higher than wall temperature (T-w), and therefore, T-aw does not always play the role as the driving potential. Reversed heat transfer through the airfoil wall from downstream to upstream is possible, and this reversed heat flow will make T-w > T-aw in the near injection hole region. Yet evidence supports that Taw cat be used to correctly predict the heat flux direction and always result in a positive adiabatic heat transfer coefficient (h(af)). The results further suggest that two different test walls are recommended for conducting film cooling experiments: a low thermal conductivity material should be used for obtaining accurate T-aw and a relative high thermal conductivity material be used for conjugate cooling experiment. Insulating a high-conductivity wall will result in T-aw distribution that will not provide correct heat flux or haf values near the injection hole.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 481
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001GT0405 ASME
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1971, FILM COOLING ADV HEA
  • [3] Film cooling from shaped holes
    Bell, CM
    Hamakawa, H
    Ligrani, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (02): : 224 - 232
  • [4] BOHN D, 1995, P 1995 YOK INT GAS T
  • [5] BOHN D, 1995, 957105 AIAA
  • [6] Bohn D., 1999, 99GT220 IGTI
  • [7] A detailed analysis of film cooling physics: Part IV - Compound-angle injection with shaped holes
    Brittingham, RA
    Leylek, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (01): : 133 - 145
  • [8] *FLUENT INC, 2005, FLUENT MAN VERS 6 2
  • [9] Film cooling effectiveness and mass heat transfer coefficient downstream of one row of discrete holes
    Goldstein, RJ
    Jin, P
    Olson, RL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (02): : 225 - 232
  • [10] Han Z., 2000, 2000GT253 IGTI