The Politics of Knowing "Organizational Sustainable Development"

被引:40
作者
Tregidga, Helen [1 ]
Kearins, Kate [1 ]
Milne, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Business & Law, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Canterbury, Coll Business & Econ, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
关键词
organizational discourse; sustainable development; reporting; taken-for-granted assumptions; legitimation; GREEN; BUSINESS;
D O I
10.1177/1086026612474957
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We critically examine organizational representations of sustainable development in 197 publicly available corporate reports. Using a discourse theoretical approach, we analyze how these organizations have come to "know" sustainable development, and we consider the conditions that made this knowledge possible. Themes identified are (a) enlightened self-interest and the business case, (b) organizational sustainable development as a balancing act, (c) organizational sustainable development as necessary and important, (d) being sustainable as responsibility and/or obligation, (e) organizational sustainable development as challenge and opportunity, and (f) sustainable development as a new and an old concept. Taken-for-granted assumptions in corporate reports emphasize organizational ability to manage sustainably underpinned by optimism about technological advancements, continuous improvement, and efficiencies. The organizational construction of sustainable development "accommodates" current organizations and systems of organizing. More extensive and compelling engagement with the discourse is required by both practitioners and academics, and with each other-if an environmentally, socially, and economically enabling construction of sustainable development is to be realized.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 129
页数:28
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Alvesson M., 1996, COMMUNICATION POWER
[2]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIES SUSTAINAB
[3]  
Ball A., 2000, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V9, P1
[4]   Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature [J].
Banerjee, SB .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2003, 24 (01) :143-180
[5]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736
[6]  
Bebbington J., 1997, AUDITING ACCOUNTABIL, V10, P365, DOI [10.1108/09513579710178115, DOI 10.1108/09513579710178115]
[7]  
Benton T., 1999, Fairness and Futurity, P199
[8]   The geo-politics of sustainable development: bureaucracies and politicians in search of the holy grail [J].
Boehmer-Christiansen, S .
GEOFORUM, 2002, 33 (03) :351-365
[9]  
Carabine J., 2001, DISCOURSE DATA GUIDE, P267
[10]  
Cooper C., 1995, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, V6, P175, DOI DOI 10.1006/CPAC.1995.1019