Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron(TM) version 2.5) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized, controlled, parallel study

被引:72
|
作者
Ahmed, M [1 ]
Bell, T [1 ]
Lawrence, WT [1 ]
Ward, JP [1 ]
Watson, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] EASTBOURNE DIST GEN HOSP,EASTBOURNE,E SUSSEX,ENGLAND
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1997年 / 79卷 / 02期
关键词
TUMT; TURP; Prostatron(TM); Prostasoft v.2.5(TM); obstruction; symptoms; BPH;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.1997.02667.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with urethral cooling in a high-energy protocol (Prostatron(TM) version 2.5), with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURF) for the treatment of symptomatic, uncomplicated, urodynamically obstructive beni,an prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Patients and methods Patients with moderate to severe symptomatic, uncomplicated BPH, unequivocally obstructed as assessed from the Abrams-Griffith nomogram, who were technically suitable for either form of treatment, were randomized into two groups of 30 patients each to undergo either TUMT or TURF. Five efficacy variables, i.e. the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), voiding pressure at maximal now (Pdet max) and prostatic volume determined by ultrasonography (PV) were measured initially and 6 months after treatment using a defined protocol. Complications were recorded during and up to 6 months after the treatment. As the variables were independent, the data were analysed using a paired t-test for each to assess the treatment effect for each group. Results After TURF, all the variables improved significantly; after TUMT, the symptoms improved both clinically and statistically (P<0,001), with the mean AUA symptom score decreasing from 18.4 to 5.2. However, none of the objective variables improved after TUMT, The energy delivered under software control correlated poorly with prostatic volume (r= 0.322). TUMT had considerably lower morbidity than TURF, but failure of ejaculation occurred in four of 18 sexually active men after TUMT. Conclusions Despite considerable improvement in their symptoms, TUMT using the Prostatron and Prostasoft v2.5 did not alleviate obstruction in patients with BPH. Patients treated using TUMT controlled by this software should be informed of the possibility of ejaculatory dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 185
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of inguinal hernia with benign prostatic hyperplasia: simultaneous inguinal hernioplasty with transurethral resection of prostate.
    Amarpreet S. Bawa
    Rajender K. Batra
    Rajdeep Singh
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2003, 35 (4) : 503 - 506
  • [32] Comparison of photoselective vaporization and standard transurethral resection of the prostate on urodynamics in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Nomura, Hiroyuki
    Seki, Narihito
    Yamaguchi, Akito
    Naito, Seiji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (08) : 657 - 662
  • [33] Combination of transurethral resection of the prostate and flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for benign prostatic hyperplasia and ureteral calculus
    He, Kunlun
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Dong
    Yu, Qian
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (08) : 3395 - 3401
  • [34] Use of Medical Therapy and Success of Laser Surgery and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Strope, Seth A.
    Vetter, Joel
    Elliott, Sean
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Olsen, Margaret A.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (06) : 1115 - 1122
  • [35] Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of &gt;40 g
    Gupta, N
    Sivaramakrishna
    Kumar, R
    Dogra, PN
    Seth, A
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [36] A randomized trial comparing thulium laser resection to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: four-year follow-up results
    Cui, Di
    Sun, Feng
    Zhuo, Jian
    Sun, Xiaowen
    Han, Bangmin
    Zhao, Fujun
    Jing, Yifeng
    Lu, Jun
    Xia, Shujie
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (03) : 683 - 689
  • [37] Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Hu, Yangyang
    Dong, Xuecheng
    Wang, Guangchun
    Huang, Jianhua
    Liu, Min
    Peng, Bo
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [38] Mean time of catheter removal in bipolar versus monopolar diathermy in transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Soomro, Muhammad Imran
    Shaikh, Aamir Ali
    Soomro, Muhammad Iqbal
    Mirani, Azizullah
    Shaikh, Nisar Ahmed
    Jalbani, Malik Hussain
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 46 (01): : 83 - 86
  • [39] COMPARASION OF TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (TURP) AND TRANSURETHRAL PLASMAVAPOURASATION (TUVAP) OF PROSTATE IN BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY PATIENTS BY USING PLASMAKINETIC TISSUE TREATMENT SYSTEMS
    Atalay, Anil
    Kucukpolat, Salim
    Toktas, Gokhan
    Unluer, Erdinc
    Kocan, Huseyin
    Coskun, Emin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 33 (03): : 308 - 316
  • [40] Risk factors for pharmacotherapy for storage symptoms after transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Tsai, Cheng-Han
    Fan, Yu-Hua
    Lin, Alex T. L.
    Huang, William J.
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2022, 14 (05) : 329 - 333