Patent protection, innovation, and technology transfer in a Schumpeterian economy

被引:21
作者
Zheng, Zhijie [1 ]
Huang, Chien-Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Yibai [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Ctr Innovat & Dev Studies, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[2] Acad Sinica, Inst Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Econ, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Int Univ Japan, Res Inst, Niigata, Japan
[5] Univ Macau, Dept Econ, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovation; Intellectual Property Rights Protection; North-South Product Cycles; R&D; Technology Transfer; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PRODUCT-CYCLE MODEL; NORTH-SOUTH TRADE; MULTINATIONAL FIRMS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; GROWTH; IMITATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103531
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the cross-country effects of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection on the relative wage, innovation, and technology transfer in a North-South quality-ladder model with innovative Northern R&D and adaptive Southern R&D. The degree of IPR protection in two countries differs in terms of patent breadth, which determines the markups of Northern firms and their Southern affiliates, respectively. In this model, stronger IPR protection in the South leads to a permanent decrease in the North-South wage gap, a temporary increase in the Northern innovation rate, and a permanent increase in technology transfer. By contrast, stronger IPR protection in the North leads to a permanent increase in the North-South wage gap, ambiguous effects on the Northern innovation rate, and a permanent decrease in technology transfer. Finally, we perform a quantitative analysis by calibrating the model to the US-China data, and the numerical results support these policy implications in addition to a welfare implication such that strengthening patent pro-tection in one country leads to sizable welfare improvements in both countries. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Alp, Harun ;
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Kerr, William .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (11) :3450-3491
[2]   INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY, COMPETITION AND INNOVATION [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2012, 10 (01) :1-42
[3]   Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Jones, Charles, I ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Webb, Michael .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 110 (04) :1104-1144
[4]  
Braga Primo., 1998, DUKE J COMP INT LAW, V9, P163
[5]   INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT [J].
Branstetter, Lee ;
Saggi, Kamal .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2011, 121 (555) :1161-1191
[6]   Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? [J].
Branstetter, Lee ;
Fisman, Ray ;
Foley, C. Fritz ;
Saggi, Kamal .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 83 (01) :27-36
[7]  
Branstetter LG, 2006, Q J ECON, V121, P321
[8]   Globalization and the gains from variety [J].
Broda, Christian ;
Weinstein, David E. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 121 (02) :541-585
[9]  
Caballero R.J., 2002, PATENTS CITATIONS IN
[10]   INNOVATION AND IMITATION: EFFECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN A PRODUCT-CYCLE MODEL OF SKILLS ACCUMULATION [J].
Chen, Hung-Ju .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2018, 22 (06) :1475-1509