National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)

被引:20
作者
Laidlaw, Anita [1 ]
Salisbury, Helen [2 ]
Doherty, Eva M. [3 ]
Wiskin, Connie [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Med, St Andrews KY16 9TF, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[3] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Natl Surg Training Ctr, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Clinical communication; Assessment; Survey; STANDARDIZED-PATIENT; SKILLS; STUDENTS; COMPETENCE; KNOWLEDGE; SCHOOLS;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-14-10
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: All medical schools in the UK are required to be able to provide evidence of competence in clinical communication in their graduates. This is usually provided by summative assessment of clinical communication, but there is considerable variation in how this is carried out. This study aimed to gain insight into the current assessment of clinical communication in UK medical schools. Methods: The survey was sent via e-mail to communication leads who then were asked to consult with all staff within their medical school involved in the assessment of communication. Results: Results were obtained from 27 out of 33 schools (response rate 82%) and a total of 34 courses. The average number of assessments per year was 2.4 (minimum 0, maximum 10). The Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) was the most commonly used method of assessment (53%). Other assessments included MCQ and workplace based assessments. Only nine courses used a single method of assessment. Issues raised included, logistics and costs of assessing mainly by OSCE, the robustness and reliability of such exams and integration with other clinical skills. Conclusions: It is encouraging that a variety of assessment methods are being used within UK medical schools and that these methods target different components of clinical communication skills acquisition.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education
[2]  
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), 1998, LEARN OBJ MED STUD E
[3]  
Australian Medical Council, 2010, GOALS MED ED
[4]   Assessing the written communication skills of medical school graduates [J].
Boulet, JR ;
Rebbecchi, TA ;
Denton, EC ;
McKinley, DW ;
Whelan, GP .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2004, 9 (01) :47-60
[5]   Assessing the comparability of standardized patient and physician evaluations of clinical skills [J].
Boulet, JR ;
McKinley, DW ;
Norcini, JJ ;
Whelan, GP .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2002, 7 (02) :85-97
[6]   How clinical communication has become a core part of medical education in the UK [J].
Brown, Jo .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (03) :271-278
[7]   Relationship between clinical competence and interpersonal and communication skills in standardized-patient assessment [J].
Colliver, JA ;
Swartz, MH ;
Robbs, RS ;
Cohen, DS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (03) :271-274
[8]   Summative assessment of medical students' communication skills and professional attitudes through observation in clinical practice [J].
De Haes, JCJM ;
Oort, FJ ;
Hulsman, RL .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (07) :583-589
[9]   Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: A psychometric study [J].
Guiton, G ;
Hodgson, CS ;
Delandshere, G ;
Wilkerson, L .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2004, 9 (03) :179-187
[10]  
HARDEN RM, 1979, MED EDUC, V13, P41