How yield process misspecification affects the solution of disassemble-to-order problems

被引:23
作者
Inderfurth, Karl [1 ]
Vogelgesang, Stephanie [1 ]
Langella, Ian M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Econ & Management, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Shippensburg Univ, John L Grove Coll Business, Shippensburg, PA 17257 USA
关键词
Remanufacturing; Random yields; Disassemble-to-order problem; Binomial yields; Stochastically proportional yields; Yield misspecification; LOOP SUPPLY CHAINS; OPTIMAL ACQUISITION; DECISIONS; ECONOMICS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Random yields from production are often present in manufacturing systems and there are several ways that this can be modeled. In disassembly planning for product recovery, e.g., we face high yield uncertainty in harvesting parts from cores. In this case, yield randomness often is modeled as either stochastically proportional or binomial. A statistical analysis of data from engine remanufacturing of a major car producer fails to provide conclusive evidence on which kind of yield randomness might prevail. In order to gain insight into the importance of this yield assumption, the impact of possible yield misspecification on the solution of the disassemble-to-order problem is investigated. Our results show that the penalty for misspecifying the yield method can be substantial, and provide insight on when the penalty would likely be problematic. The results also indicate that in the absence of conclusive information on which alternative should be chosen, presuming binomial yields generally leads to lower cost penalties and therefore preferable results. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 67
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Product reuse economics in closed-loop supply chain research
    Atasu, Atalay
    Guide, V. Daniel R., Jr.
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 17 (05) : 483 - 496
  • [2] Bakal IS, 2006, PROD OPER MANAG, V15, P407, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00254.x
  • [3] The economics of yield-driven processes
    Bohn, RE
    Terwiesch, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (01) : 41 - 59
  • [4] ROBUST TESTS FOR EQUALITY OF VARIANCES
    BROWN, MB
    FORSYTHE, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) : 364 - 367
  • [5] Ferguson M, 2009, PROD OPER MANAG, V18, P300, DOI [10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01033.x, 10.3401/poms.1080.01033]
  • [6] A Profit-Maximizing Approach to Disposition Decisions for Product Returns
    Ferguson, Mark E.
    Fleischmann, Moritz
    Souza, Gilvan C.
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCES, 2011, 42 (03) : 773 - 798
  • [7] Galbreth MR, 2006, PROD OPER MANAG, V15, P384, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00252.x
  • [8] Optimal Acquisition Quantities in Remanufacturing with Condition Uncertainty
    Galbreth, Michael R.
    Blackburn, Joseph D.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 19 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [9] Multiple lotsizing in production to order with random yields: Review of recent advances
    Grosfeld-Nir, A
    Gerchak, Y
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 126 (1-4) : 43 - 69
  • [10] Guide VDR, 1998, J OPER MANAG, V16, P551, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00024-7