Assessing global preparedness for the next pandemic: development and application of an Epidemic Preparedness Index

被引:126
作者
Ben Oppenheim [1 ]
Gallivan, Mark [1 ]
Madhav, Nita K. [1 ]
Brown, Naor [1 ]
Serhiyenko, Volodymyr [1 ]
Wolfe, Nathan D. [1 ]
Ayscue, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Metabiota, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA
关键词
SURVEILLANCE; INFLUENZA; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001157
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Robust metrics for national-level preparedness are critical for assessing global resilience to epidemic and pandemic outbreaks. However, existing preparedness assessments focus primarily on public health systems or specific legislative frameworks, and do not measure other essential capacities that enable and support public health preparedness and response. Methods We developed an Epidemic Preparedness Index (EPI) to assess national-level preparedness. The EPI is global, covering 188 countries. It consists of five subindices measuring each country's economic resources, public health communications, infrastructure, public health systems and institutional capacity. To evaluate the construct validity of the EPI, we tested its correlation with proxy measures for preparedness and response capacity, including the timeliness of outbreak detection and reporting, as well as vaccination rates during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Results The most prepared countries were concentrated in Europe and North America, while the least prepared countries clustered in Central and West Africa and Southeast Asia. Better prepared countries were found to report infectious disease outbreaks more quickly and to have vaccinated a larger proportion of their population during the 2009 pandemic. Conclusion The EPI measures a country's capacity to detect and respond to infectious disease events. Existing tools, such as the Joint External Evaluation (JEE), have been designed to measure preparedness within a country over time. The EPI complements the JEE by providing a holistic view of preparedness and is constructed to support comparative risk assessment between countries. The index can be updated rapidly to generate global estimates of pandemic preparedness that can inform strategy and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adcock R, 2001, MEASUREMENT VALIDITY
[2]  
Adler M, 1996, GAZING ORACLE DELPHI, P252
[3]   Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases [J].
Allen, Toph ;
Murray, Kris A. ;
Zambrana-Torrelio, Carlos ;
Morse, Stephen S. ;
Rondinini, Carlo ;
Di Marco, Moreno ;
Breit, Nathan ;
Olival, Kevin J. ;
Daszak, Peter .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, RESOLVE SAVE LIVES I
[5]  
Bell D, 2006, EMERG INFECT DIS, V12, P88
[6]   Global capacity for emerging infectious disease detection [J].
Chan, Emily H. ;
Brewer, Timothy F. ;
Madoff, Lawrence C. ;
Pollack, Marjorie P. ;
Sonricker, Amy L. ;
Keller, Mikaela ;
Freifeld, Clark C. ;
Blench, Michael ;
Mawudeku, Abla ;
Brownstein, John S. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (50) :21701-21706
[7]   CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE [J].
FINK, A ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
CHASSIN, M ;
BROOK, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) :979-983
[8]   Conflict and emerging infectious diseases [J].
Gayer, Michelle ;
Legros, Dominique ;
Formenty, Pierre ;
Connolly, Maire A. .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 13 (11) :1625-1631
[9]   Addressing contact tracing challenges-critical to halting Ebola virus disease transmission [J].
Greiner, Ashley L. ;
Angelo, Kristina M. ;
McCollum, Andrea M. ;
Mirkovic, Kelsey ;
Arthur, Ray ;
Angulo, Frederick J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 41 :53-55
[10]   Analysis of results from the Joint External Evaluation: examining its strength and assessing for trends among participating countries [J].
Gupta, Vin ;
Kraemer, John D. ;
Katz, Rebecca ;
Jha, Ashish K. ;
Keny, Vanessa B. ;
Sane, Jussi ;
Ollgren, Jukka ;
Salminen, Mika O. .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 8 (02)