A Comparison of the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine (with Epinephrine) and Their Equal Volume Mixtures with Lidocaine Used for Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Blocks: A Double-Blind Randomized Study

被引:96
作者
Cuvillon, Philippe [1 ,2 ]
Nouvellon, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Ripart, Jacques [1 ,2 ]
Boyer, Jean-Christophe [3 ]
Dehour, Laurence [1 ,2 ]
Mahamat, Aba [4 ,5 ]
L'Hermite, Joel [1 ,2 ]
Boisson, Christophe [1 ,2 ]
Vialles, Nathalie [1 ,2 ]
Lefrant, Jean Yves [1 ,2 ]
de la Coussaye, Jean Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grp Caremeau Hosp, Div Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Nimes, France
[2] Univ Montpellier I, F-34006 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Grp Caremeau Hosp, Biochim Lab, F-30029 Nimes, France
[4] Inst Univ Rech Clin, Epidemiol & Biostat Lab, Montpellier, France
[5] CHU Nimes, Dept Med Informat, Nimes, France
关键词
LUMBAR-PLEXUS; PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; CARDIAC-ARREST; TOXICITY; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; RESUSCITATION; MEPIVACAINE; ETIDOCAINE; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e31819237f8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mixtures of lidocaine with a long-acting local anesthetic are commonly used for peripheral nerve block. Few data are available regarding the safety, efficacy, or pharmacokinetics of mixtures of local anesthetics. In the Current study, we compared the effects of bupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.75% alone or in a mixed solution of equal volumes of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% or ropivacaine 0.75%, and lidocaine 2% for surgery after femoral-sciatic peripheral nerve block. The primary end point was onset time. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized study, 82 adults scheduled for lower limb surgery received a sciatic (20 mL) and femoral (20 mL) peripheral nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine (200 mg), a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine 20 mL (100 mg) with 2% lidocaine (400 mg), 0.75% ropivacaine (300 mg) or a mixture of 0.75% ropivacaine 20 mL (150 mg) with 2% lidocaine (400 mg). Each solution contained epinephrine 1:200,000. Times to perform blocks, onset times (end of injection to complete sensory and motor block), duration of sensory and motor block, and morphine consumption via IV patient-controlled analgesia were compared. Venous blood samples of 5 mL were collected for determination of drug concentration at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min after placement of the block. RESULTS: Patient demographics and Surgical times were similar for all four groups. Sciatic onset limes (sensory and motor block) were reduced by combining lidocaine with Hie long-acting local anesthetic. The onset of bupivacaine-lidocaine was 16 +/- 9 min versus 28 +/- 12 min for bupivacaine alone. The onset of ropivacaine-lidocaine was 16 +/- 12 min versus 23 +/- 12 for ropivacaine alone. Sensory blocks were complete for all patients within 40 min for those receiving bupivacaine-lidocaine versus 60 min for those receiving bupivacaine alone and 30 min for those receiving ropivacaine-lidocaine versus 40 min for those receiving ropivacaine alone (P < 0.05). Duration of sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in mixture groups. There was no difference among groups for visual analog scald pain scores and morphine consumption during the 48 h postoperative period, except for bupivacaine alone (median: 9 mg) versus bupivacaine-lidocaine mixture (15 mg), P < 0.01. There was no difference in die incidence of adverse events among groups. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine were higher, and remained elevated longer, in patients who received only the long-acting local anesthetic compared to patients who received the mixture of long-acting local anesthetic with lidocaine (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Mixtures of long-acting local anesthetics with lidocaine induced faster onset blocks of decreased duration. Whether there is a safety benefit is unclear, as the benefit of a decreased concentration of long-acting local anesthetic may be offset by the presence of a significant plasma concentration of lidocaine.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 649
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] CARDIAC-ARREST FOLLOWING REGIONAL ANESTHESIA WITH ETIDOCAINE OR BUPIVACAINE
    ALBRIGHT, GA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1979, 51 (04) : 285 - 287
  • [2] Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks
    Casati, A
    Fanelli, G
    Borghi, B
    Torri, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) : 1047 - 1052
  • [3] Comparison of the parasacral approach and the posterior approach, with single- and double-injection techniques, to block the sciatic nerve
    Cuvillon, P
    Ripart, J
    Jeannes, P
    Mahamat, A
    Boisson, C
    L'Hermite, J
    Vernes, E
    de la Coussaye, JE
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (06) : 1436 - 1441
  • [4] A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and mepivacaine during sciatic and femoral nerve blockade
    Fanelli, G
    Casati, A
    Beccaria, P
    Aldegheri, G
    Berti, M
    Tarantino, F
    Torri, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (03) : 597 - 600
  • [5] Groban L, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P37
  • [6] COMPARISON OF 4 LOCAL EXTRADURAL ANESTHETIC SOLUTIONS FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN-SECTION
    HOWELL, P
    DAVIES, W
    WRIGLEY, M
    TAN, P
    MORGAN, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (05) : 648 - 653
  • [7] Kaloul I, 2004, CAN J ANAESTH, V51, P52, DOI 10.1007/BF03018547
  • [8] KAUKINEN S, 1980, ANN CHIR GYNAECOL, V69, P281
  • [9] Hemodynamic and cardiac electrophysiologic effects of lidocaine-bupivacaine mixture in anesthetized and ventilated piglets
    Lefrant, JY
    Muller, L
    de La Coussaye, JE
    Lalourcey, L
    Ripart, J
    Peray, PA
    Mazoit, X
    Dauzat, M
    Sassine, A
    Eledjam, JJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [10] Extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency Caesarean section - A comparison of three solutions
    Lucas, DN
    Ciccone, GK
    Yentis, SM
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (12) : 1173 - 1177