Gradient Calibration for the RCBHT Cantilever Snap Verification System.

被引:0
作者
Rojas, J. [1 ]
Harada, K. [1 ]
Onda, H. [1 ]
Yamanobe, N. [1 ]
Yoshida, E. [1 ]
Nagata, K. [1 ]
Kawai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] AIST, Intelligent Sys Res Inst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058568, Japan
来源
2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND BIOMIMETICS (ROBIO 2012) | 2012年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this work a gradient calibration method was presented as part of the Relative-Change-Based-Hierarchical Taxonomy (RCBHT) cantilever-snap verification system and the Pivot Approach control strategy for the automation of cantilever-snaps. As part of a relative-change based force signal interpretation scheme, an effective gradient calibration process is needed to increase the RCBHT's system robustness. Prior to this work, all gradient classification schemes were derived on an intuitive trial and error basis. Statistical measures were used to derive contact and constant gradient thresholds in contextually sensitive ways. The method requires training assemblies to identify a minimum contact gradient which serves as a marker for all other gradient thresholds. Experimental procedures verified that our calibration method was effective. Assemblies with supervised successful outcomes were used in experimentation. The RCBHT assessed out assemblies as successful using the calibration method. Even two snaps that where classified falsely as unsuccessful when using a previously non-calibrated version of the RCBHT.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   APPROACH TO HIERARCHICAL AND MODULAR PROGRAM CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFICATION - THE iota PROGRAMMING SYSTEM. [J].
Nakajima, Reiji .
Japan Annual Reviews in Electronics, Computers & Telecommunications: Computer Science & Technologi, 1982, :126-150
[42]   COMMISSIONING AND VERIFICATION OF A COMMERCIAL PHOTON MONTE CARLO TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM. [J].
Behrens, C. ;
Ottosson, R. ;
Karlsson, A. ;
Samsoe, E. ;
Sjostrom, D. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 :S223-S223
[43]   Testing/calibration services, an hybrid approach to laboratory's quality system. [J].
Shekhar, C ;
Kimothi, SK .
40TH ANNUAL EOQ CONGRESS, BERLIN, 1996 - PROCEEDINGS, VOL 3, 1996, :235-240
[44]   Calibration and Verification of Pointing and Tracking System for Optical Communication Terminal [J].
Sansone, Francesco ;
Branz, Francesco ;
Vettor, Andrea ;
Birello, Edoardo ;
Guizzo, Gian Paolo ;
Antonello, Riccardo ;
Francesconi, Alessandro .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2023, 61 (02) :510-517
[45]   JOSEPHSON ARRAY VOLTAGE CALIBRATION SYSTEM - OPERATIONAL USE AND VERIFICATION [J].
STEINER, RL ;
FIELD, BF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 1989, 38 (02) :296-301
[46]   Automatic behavioural model calibration for efficient PLL system verification [J].
Mounir, A ;
Mostafa, A ;
Fikry, M .
DESIGNERS FORUM: DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, 2003, :280-285
[47]   Investigation into the verification of the Synapsys videonystagmography (VNG) Ulmer calibration system [J].
Corless, Natalie ;
Goggins, Susannah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2014, 53 (09) :618-624
[48]   Legal Metrology and System for Calibration and Verification of the Radar Level Sensors [J].
Markovic, Jaromir ;
Mihok, Jozef ;
Duris, Stanislav ;
Schreier, Zbynek .
QUALITY INNOVATION PROSPERITY-KVALITA INOVACIA PROSPERITA, 2016, 20 (01) :95-103
[49]   Gradient nonlinearity calibration and correction for a compact, asymmetric magnetic resonance imaging gradient system [J].
Tao, S. ;
Trzasko, J. D. ;
Gunter, J. L. ;
Weavers, P. T. ;
Shu, Y. ;
Huston, J., III ;
Lee, S. K. ;
Tan, E. T. ;
Bernstein, M. A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (02) :N18-N31
[50]   Internal Calibration System Using Learning Algorithm With Gradient Descent [J].
Jung, Chan-Yong ;
Bae, Kyung-Bin ;
Kim, Dong-Chan ;
Park, Seong-Ook .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 17 (09) :1503-1507