Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: clinical outcomes and complications

被引:5
|
作者
Raju, Sneha [1 ,2 ]
Eisenberg, Naomi [3 ]
Montbriand, Janice [3 ]
Roche-Nagle, Graham [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto Gen Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Div Vasc Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Obstet Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY; RISK; AGE;
D O I
10.1503/cjs.009019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with decreased perioperative morbidity and mortaliy in comparison with open repair, and thus octagenarians are traditionally offered EVAR given their age and medical comorbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes and predictors of complications associated with EVAR in octogenarians. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged 80 years and older who received an EVAR between August 2010 and January 2017 at a single centre in Toronto, Ontario. We conducted univariate comparisons and then completed logistic regression to determine predictors of complications. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to explore survival times. Results A total of 154 octogenarians underwent an EVAR during the study period for an infrarenal aneurysm with a mean size of 64.8 (standard deviation [SD] 12.7) mm. The mean age of the patients was 84.1 (SD 3.7) years, and most patients (81%) were men. Eighteen patients presented with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Ninety-five (62%) patients sustained a complication. Fifty percent of patients experienced an intraoperative complication. A majority of these (77%) resulted in an endoleak, with type II endoleaks requiring no further intervenion being the most common (58%,n= 45). The remaining complications (n= 70) occurred postoperatively, with myocardial ischemia (n= 24) and dysrhythmias (n= 10) being the most common. Past aortic surgery (chi(2)= 8.62,p= 0.014, CramerV= 0.27) was found to be a multivariate predictor of complications. Most patients (88%) continued follow-up to an average of 20.9 months. Twenty-one patients (13%) died. Nine of these deaths (43%) occurred during the index admission and involved a ruptured AAA. Past aortic surgery was the only predictor of vascular complications. The mean survival time after EVAR was 57.63 months for patients without events. Conclusion Endovascular aneurysm repair in octogenarians is a suitable form of therapy with acceptable short- and long-term results in the elective setting. Past aortic surgery was a predictor of complications in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:E329 / E337
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in nonagenarians
    Zhang, H. P.
    Guo, W.
    Liu, X. P.
    Jia, X.
    Xiong, J.
    Ma, X. H.
    Zhang, M. H.
    Xu, Y. L.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2013, 12 (04) : 6907 - 6914
  • [42] Outcomes in Octogenarians and the Effect of Comorbidities After Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Alberga, Anna J.
    Karthaus, Eleonora G.
    van Zwet, Erik W.
    de Bruin, Jorg L.
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Wever, Jan J.
    Verhagen, Hence J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 61 (06) : 920 - 928
  • [43] Radiological Evaluation of Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Thakor, Avnesh S.
    Tanner, James
    Ong, Shao J.
    Hughes-Roberts, Ynyr
    Ilyas, Shahzad
    Cousins, Claire
    See, Teik C.
    Klass, Darren
    Winterbottom, Andrew P.
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2015, 66 (03): : 277 - 290
  • [44] Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Have Improved Outcomes with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Compared with Open Repair
    Jonker, Frederik H. W.
    Schloesser, Felix J. V.
    Dewan, Michael
    Huddle, Matthew
    Sergi, Michael
    Dardik, Alan
    Muhs, Bart E.
    VASCULAR, 2009, 17 (06) : 316 - 324
  • [45] Predicting aortic complications after endovascular aneurysm repair
    Karthikesalingam, A.
    Holt, P. J.
    Vidal-Diez, A.
    Choke, E. C.
    Patterson, B. O.
    Thompson, L. J.
    Ghatwary, T.
    Bown, M. J.
    Sayers, R. D.
    Thompson, M. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (10) : 1302 - 1311
  • [46] A systematic review of anatomic predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm remodeling after endovascular repair
    van Rijswijk, Rianne E.
    Jebbink, Erik Groot
    Zeebregts, Clark J.
    Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (05) : 1777 - 1785
  • [47] Prognostic model for survival of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair
    Meuli, Lorenz
    Zimmermann, Alexander
    Menges, Anna-Leonie
    Stefanikova, Sandra
    Reutersberg, Benedikt
    Makaloski, Vladimir
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [48] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Is endovascular aneurysm repair the answer for everybody?
    Aziz, Faisal
    SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 29 (1-2) : 35 - 40
  • [49] Patients' Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Mandigers, Tim J.
    Fulgheri, Irene
    Pugliese, Giorgia
    Bissacco, Daniele
    Savare, Laura
    Ieva, Francesca
    Campoleoni, Mauro
    van Herwaarden, Joost A.
    Trimarchi, Santi
    Domanin, Maurizio
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 98 : 115 - 123
  • [50] Pragmatic Minimum Reporting Standards for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Boyle, Jonathan R.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    Vallabhaneni, S. Rao
    Bell, Rachael E.
    Brennan, John A.
    Browne, Tom F.
    Cheshire, Nicholas J.
    Hinchliffe, Robert J.
    Jenkins, Michael P.
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Macdonald, Sumaira
    McCarthy, Mark J.
    McWilliams, Richard G.
    Morgan, Robert A.
    Oshin, Olufemi A.
    Pemberton, R. Mark
    Pillay, Woolagasen R.
    Sayers, Robert D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2011, 18 (03) : 263 - 271