Outcome of repeated multi-stage arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with severe acetabular bone loss: a case series

被引:3
作者
Froeschen, Frank S. [1 ]
Randau, Thomas M. [1 ]
Hischebeth, Gunnar T. R. [2 ]
Gravius, Nadine [1 ]
Wirtz, Dieter C. [1 ]
Gravius, Sascha [1 ,3 ]
Walter, Sebastian G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Sigmund Freud Str 25, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Bonn, Inst Med Microbiol Immunol & Parasitol, Bonn, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Hosp Mannheim, Med Fac Mannheim, Orthopaed & Trauma Surg Ctr, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Acetabular bone loss; aseptic loosening; custom-made acetabular component; pelvic discontinuity; periprosthetic joint infection; revision total hip arthroplasty; risk factor; treatment failure; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; PELVIC DISCONTINUITY; REVISION HIP; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPONENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1177/1120700020928247
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Failed reconstruction in cases of severe acetabular bone loss, with or without pelvic discontinuity, in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) remains a great challenge in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of a "second" rTHA with "custom-made acetabular components (CMACs)" after a previously failed reconstruction with CMACs. Methods: 4 patients with severe acetabular bone loss (Paprosky Type IIIB), who required a second rTHA after a previously failed reconstruction with CMAC, due to prosthetic joint infection (PJI), were included in our retrospective study. All prostheses had been constructed on the basis of thin-layer computed-tomography scans of the pelvis. The second rTHA was considered unsuccessful in the event of PJI or aseptic loosening (AL) with need for renewed CMAC explantation. Results: The treatment success rate after second rTHA with a CMAC was 50% (2 of 4). In the successful cases, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris Hip Score (HHS) after the second rTHA (VAS range 2-4; HHS range 45-58 points) did not differ from those after the first rTHA, before onset of symptoms (VAS: range 2-4; HHS: range 47-55 points). In the failed cases, the second CMACs needed to be explanted due to PJI, with renewed detection of previous pathogens. Patients with treatment failure of the second CMAC had required a higher number of revision surgeries after explantation of the first CMAC than patients with a successful outcome. Conclusions: In patients with severe acetabular bone loss and previously failed rTHA with CMACs, repeat rTHA with a CMAC may be a solid treatment option for patients with an "uncomplicated" multi-stage procedure, i.e., without persisting infection after explantation of the original CMAC. While the outcome in terms of clinical function does not appear negatively affected by such a "second attempt," the complication rate and risk of reinfection, nonetheless, is high.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Are Custom Triflange Acetabular Components Effective for Reconstruction of Catastrophic Bone Loss? [J].
Berasi, Carl C. ;
Berend, Keith R. ;
Adams, Joanne B. ;
Ruh, Erin L. ;
Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (02) :528-535
[2]  
Christie MJ, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P216
[3]   Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty [J].
Friedrich, Max J. ;
Schmolders, Jan ;
Michel, Robert D. ;
Randau, Thomas M. ;
Wimmer, Matthias D. ;
Kohlhof, Hendrik ;
Wirtz, Dieter C. ;
Gravius, Sascha .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (12) :2455-2461
[4]   Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss [J].
Froeschen, F. S. ;
Randau, T. M. ;
Hischebeth, G. T. R. ;
Gravius, N. ;
Gravius, S. ;
Walter, S. G. .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (02) :263-273
[6]   Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Standardized List, Definitions, and Stratification Developed by The Hip Society [J].
Healy, William L. ;
Iorio, Richard ;
Clair, Andrew J. ;
Pellegrini, Vincent D. ;
Della Valle, Craig J. ;
Berend, Keith R. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (02) :357-364
[7]   Total Hip Arthroplasty in 2017-Current Concepts and Recent Advances [J].
Khanduja, Vikas .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 51 (04) :357-358
[8]   Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 [J].
Kurtz, Steven ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Mowat, Fionna ;
Halpern, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (04) :780-785
[9]  
Logroscino G, 2019, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V23, P65, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17476
[10]   The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects [J].
Mao, Yuanqing ;
Xu, Chen ;
Xu, Jiawei ;
Li, Huiwu ;
Liu, Fengxiang ;
Yu, Degang ;
Zhu, Zhenan .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) :2023-2030