When we like what we know - A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity

被引:85
作者
Bohrn, Isabel C. [1 ,5 ]
Altmann, Ulrike [1 ,5 ]
Lubrich, Oliver [2 ,5 ]
Menninghaus, Winfried [3 ,5 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Educ & Psychol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Germanist, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Philosophy & Humanities, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[4] DINE, Berlin, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Neuroaesthetics; fMRI; Reading; Striatum; Medial prefrontal cortex; NEURAL BASES; REWARD VALUE; BRAIN; RESPONSES; MODEL; ART; ATTRACTIVENESS; COMPREHENSION; APPRECIATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This paper presents a neuroscientific study of aesthetic judgments on written texts. In an fMRI experiment participants read a number of proverbs without explicitly evaluating them. In a post-scan rating they rated each item for familiarity and beauty. These individual ratings were correlated with the functional data to investigate the neural correlates of implicit aesthetic judgments. We identified clusters in which BOLD activity was correlated with individual post-scan beauty ratings. This indicates that some spontaneous aesthetic evaluation takes place during reading, even if not required by the task. Positive correlations were found in the ventral striatum and in medial prefrontal cortex, likely reflecting the rewarding nature of sentences that are aesthetically pleasing. On the contrary, negative correlations were observed in the classic left frontotemporal reading network. Midline structures and bilateral temporoparietal regions correlated positively with familiarity, suggesting a shift from the task-network towards the default network with increasing familiarity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   How We Know What Not To Think [J].
Phillips, Jonathan ;
Morris, Adam ;
Cushman, Fiery .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (12) :1026-1040
[42]   Social anxiety and internet use - A meta-analysis: What do we know? What are we missing? [J].
Prizant-Passal, Shin ;
Shechner, Tomer ;
Aderka, Idan M. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 62 :221-229
[43]   Opinion We know what attention is! [J].
Wu, Wayne .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 28 (04) :304-318
[44]   Molecular Genetic Diagnosis - What we do know about Machines? What we do want to know? [J].
Bauer, Peter ;
Hunimel, Michael ;
von Kalle, Christof ;
Schmutzler, Rita ;
Block, Andreas ;
Stroth, Matthias ;
Woopen, Christiane ;
Engelke, Karsten .
ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 :3-24
[45]   REVISITING THE CONCEPTS OF VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIT IN HRM: WHAT WE KNOW, WHAT WE DON'T KNOW, AND WHERE WE MIGHT GO [J].
Kehoe, Rebecca R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 35 (02) :175-180
[46]   What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models [J].
Mod, Heidi K. ;
Scherrer, Daniel ;
Luoto, Miska ;
Guisan, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (06) :1308-1322
[47]   Neurocognitive functioning in bipolar disorder: What we know and what we don't [J].
Keramatian, Kamyar ;
Torres, Ivan J. ;
Yatham, Lakshmi N. .
DIALOGUES IN CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 23 (01) :29-38
[48]   What we think we know about the aerodynamic performance of windows [J].
Sharpe, Patrick ;
Jones, Benjamin ;
Wilson, Robin ;
Iddon, Christopher .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 231
[49]   Practice makes perfect, especially when doing what we like [J].
Reppa, Irene ;
McDougall, Sine .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2025, 87 (03) :981-997
[50]   Evidence-based Health Informatics: How Do We Know What We Know? [J].
Ammenwerth, E. .
METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2015, 54 (04) :298-307