When we like what we know - A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity

被引:85
作者
Bohrn, Isabel C. [1 ,5 ]
Altmann, Ulrike [1 ,5 ]
Lubrich, Oliver [2 ,5 ]
Menninghaus, Winfried [3 ,5 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Educ & Psychol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Germanist, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Philosophy & Humanities, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[4] DINE, Berlin, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Neuroaesthetics; fMRI; Reading; Striatum; Medial prefrontal cortex; NEURAL BASES; REWARD VALUE; BRAIN; RESPONSES; MODEL; ART; ATTRACTIVENESS; COMPREHENSION; APPRECIATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This paper presents a neuroscientific study of aesthetic judgments on written texts. In an fMRI experiment participants read a number of proverbs without explicitly evaluating them. In a post-scan rating they rated each item for familiarity and beauty. These individual ratings were correlated with the functional data to investigate the neural correlates of implicit aesthetic judgments. We identified clusters in which BOLD activity was correlated with individual post-scan beauty ratings. This indicates that some spontaneous aesthetic evaluation takes place during reading, even if not required by the task. Positive correlations were found in the ventral striatum and in medial prefrontal cortex, likely reflecting the rewarding nature of sentences that are aesthetically pleasing. On the contrary, negative correlations were observed in the classic left frontotemporal reading network. Midline structures and bilateral temporoparietal regions correlated positively with familiarity, suggesting a shift from the task-network towards the default network with increasing familiarity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   What do we know and what should we research about employer brand? A bibliometric analysis [J].
Cam-Tu Tran ;
Collin-Lachaud, Isabelle ;
Hiep Hung Pham .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2024, 53 (07) :1612-1631
[32]   Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know? [J].
Lesciotto, Kate M. ;
Richtsmeier, Joan T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2019, 168 :27-46
[33]   Measurement Artifacts in the Assessment of Counterproductive Work Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Do We Know What We Think We Know? [J].
Spector, Paul E. ;
Bauer, Jeremy A. ;
Fox, Suzy .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (04) :781-790
[34]   Reading Literacy within a Teacher Preparation Programme: What we Know and What we Should Know [J].
van der Merwe, Zelda .
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CHILDHOOD EDUCATION, 2012, 2 (02) :137-157
[35]   How to Scale Up Primary Care Transformation: What We Know and What We Need to Know? [J].
Homer, Charles J. ;
Baron, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (06) :625-629
[36]   Post-COVID dysautonomias: what we know and (mainly) what we don't know [J].
Goldstein, David S. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2024, 20 (02) :99-113
[37]   Cognitive deficits in primary hyperparathyroidism - what we know and what we do not know: A narrative review [J].
Chandran, Manju ;
Li Yeh, Lydia Tan ;
de Jong, Mechteld C. ;
Bilezikian, John P. ;
Parameswaran, Rajeev .
REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (05) :1079-1087
[38]   Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know [J].
Valkenburg, Patti M. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 45
[39]   Learning to Read: What We Know and What We Need to Understand Better [J].
Hulme, Charles ;
Snowling, Margaret J. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 7 (01) :1-5
[40]   The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don't know, and where we are headed [J].
Tung, Rosalie L. ;
Stahl, Guenter K. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2018, 49 (09) :1167-1189