When we like what we know - A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity

被引:82
|
作者
Bohrn, Isabel C. [1 ,5 ]
Altmann, Ulrike [1 ,5 ]
Lubrich, Oliver [2 ,5 ]
Menninghaus, Winfried [3 ,5 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Educ & Psychol, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Germanist, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Dept Philosophy & Humanities, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[4] DINE, Berlin, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Neuroaesthetics; fMRI; Reading; Striatum; Medial prefrontal cortex; NEURAL BASES; REWARD VALUE; BRAIN; RESPONSES; MODEL; ART; ATTRACTIVENESS; COMPREHENSION; APPRECIATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This paper presents a neuroscientific study of aesthetic judgments on written texts. In an fMRI experiment participants read a number of proverbs without explicitly evaluating them. In a post-scan rating they rated each item for familiarity and beauty. These individual ratings were correlated with the functional data to investigate the neural correlates of implicit aesthetic judgments. We identified clusters in which BOLD activity was correlated with individual post-scan beauty ratings. This indicates that some spontaneous aesthetic evaluation takes place during reading, even if not required by the task. Positive correlations were found in the ventral striatum and in medial prefrontal cortex, likely reflecting the rewarding nature of sentences that are aesthetically pleasing. On the contrary, negative correlations were observed in the classic left frontotemporal reading network. Midline structures and bilateral temporoparietal regions correlated positively with familiarity, suggesting a shift from the task-network towards the default network with increasing familiarity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know
    Doorley, James D.
    Goodman, Fallon R.
    Kelso, Kerry C.
    Kashdan, Todd B.
    SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2020, 14 (12) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Political Simulations: What We Know, What We Think We Know, and What We Still Need to Know
    Baranowski, Michael K.
    Weir, Kimberly A.
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 11 (04) : 391 - 403
  • [3] Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Singh, Anisha
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2022, 34 (02) : 677 - 715
  • [4] Audiobooks, Print, and Comprehension: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Anisha Singh
    Patricia A. Alexander
    Educational Psychology Review, 2022, 34 : 677 - 715
  • [5] Lp(a): What we know, what we don't know and what we hope for
    Amengual, A. Moya
    Serrano-Cumplido, A.
    MEDICINA DE FAMILIA-SEMERGEN, 2025, 51 (07):
  • [6] Sleep and ADHD: what we know and what we do not know
    Cortese, Samuele
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [7] Destination competitiveness: what we know, what we know but shouldn't and what we don't know but should
    Abreu-Novais, Margarida
    Ruhanen, Lisa
    Arcodia, Charles
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2016, 19 (06) : 492 - 512
  • [8] Why do we like what we like ? When information flow matters
    Ticini, Luca F.
    Omigie, Diana
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [9] Hydrocephalus and mucopolysaccharidoses: what do we know and what do we not know?
    Dalla Corte, Amauri
    de Souza, Carolina F. M.
    Anes, Mauricio
    Giugliani, Roberto
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2017, 33 (07) : 1073 - 1080
  • [10] Zika Virus in Semen: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    Gornet, Megan E.
    Bracero, Nabal J.
    Segars, James H.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (05) : 285 - 292