Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening

被引:53
作者
Coffey, Kristen [1 ]
Jochelson, Maxine S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Evelyn H Lauder Breast Ctr, 300 East 66th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Contrast -enhanced mammography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasound; Breast neoplasms; Screening; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT PREFERENCES; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HIGH-RISK; WOMEN; MRI; CESM; TOMOSYNTHESIS; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110513
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising vascular-based breast imaging technique with high diagnostic performance in detecting breast cancer. Dual-energy acquisition using low and high energy x-ray spectra following intravenous iodinated contrast injection provides both anatomic and functional information in the same examination. The low-energy images are equivalent to standard digital mammography and the postprocessed recombined images depict enhancement analogous to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, CEM has the potential to detect abnormal morphologic features as well as neovascularity associated with breast cancer. Since its emergence in 2011, CEM has consistently demonstrated superior performance compared with standard mammography and mammography plus ultrasound, particularly in women with dense breasts, with high sensitivity approaching that of MRI, supporting its use as a cost-effective diagnostic and screening tool. CEM has been primarily used in the diagnostic setting to evaluate patients with screening abnormalities or with symptomatic breasts, to perform preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to evaluate response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More recently, CEM has been performed to screen women who have an intermediate to high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. In addition to its high diagnostic performance, CEM is less expensive and more accessible than MRI and potentially better tolerated by patients. Minor drawbacks to CEM include a slightly increased radiation dose compared with standard mammography and a low risk for contrast allergy reaction. The aim of this study is to review the background, current literature, and future applications of CEM in breast cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Radiomic Feature Reduction Approach to Predict Breast Cancer by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images [J].
Massafra, Raffaella ;
Bove, Samantha ;
Lorusso, Vito ;
Biafora, Albino ;
Comes, Maria Colomba ;
Didonna, Vittorio ;
Diotaiuti, Sergio ;
Fanizzi, Annarita ;
Nardone, Annalisa ;
Nolasco, Angelo ;
Ressa, Cosmo Maurizio ;
Tamborra, Pasquale ;
Terenzio, Antonella ;
La Forgia, Daniele .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (04)
[32]   Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study [J].
Patel, Bhavika K. ;
Ranjbar, Sara ;
Wu, Teresa ;
Pockaj, Barbara A. ;
Li, Jing ;
Zhang, Nan ;
Lobbes, Mark ;
Zhang, Bin ;
Mitchell, J. Ross .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 98 :207-213
[33]   Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography [J].
Patel, Bhavika K. ;
Gray, Richard J. ;
Pockaj, Barbara A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (06) :W231-W237
[34]   Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes [J].
Phillips, Jordana ;
Miller, Matthew M. ;
Mehta, Tejas S. ;
Fein-Zachary, Valerie ;
Nathanson, Audrey ;
Hori, Wendy ;
Monahan-Earley, Rita ;
Slanetz, Priscilla J. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 42 :193-197
[35]   Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening [J].
Pisano, ED ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Hendrick, E ;
Yaffe, M ;
Baum, JK ;
Acharyya, S ;
Conant, EF ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Bassett, L ;
D'Orsi, C ;
Jong, R ;
Rebner, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1773-1783
[36]  
Potsch N., RADIOLOGY, V0
[37]   Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors [J].
Savaridas, S. L. ;
Taylor, D. B. ;
Gunawardana, D. ;
Phillips, M. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (12) :1085.e1-1085.e9
[38]   Development of Low-Dose Photon-counting Contrast-enhanced Tomosynthesis with Spectral Imaging [J].
Schmitzberger, Florian F. ;
Fallenberg, Eva Maria ;
Lawaczeck, Ruediger ;
Hemmendorff, Magnus ;
Moa, Elin ;
Danielsson, Mats ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Diekmann, Susanne ;
Poellinger, Alexander ;
Engelken, Florian J. ;
Diekmann, Felix .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (02) :558-564
[39]  
Sickles E., 2013, ACR BI-RADS mammography ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data, Vfifth
[40]   Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging [J].
Sogani, Julie ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Kaplan, Jennifer B. ;
D'Alessio, Donna ;
Goldman, Debra ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Jochelson, Maxine S. .
RADIOLOGY, 2017, 282 (01) :63-73