Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas

被引:76
作者
Philibert, Aurore [1 ,2 ]
Loyce, Chantal [1 ,2 ]
Makowski, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Agron 211, F-78850 Thiverval Grignon, France
[2] AgroParisTech, UMR Agron 211, Thiverval Grignon, France
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; TEMPERATE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0050950
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential approximately 298 times greater than that of CO2. In 2006, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated N2O emission due to synthetic and organic nitrogen (N) fertilization at 1% of applied N. We investigated the uncertainty on this estimated value, by fitting 13 different models to a published dataset including 985 N2O measurements. These models were characterized by (i) the presence or absence of the explanatory variable "applied N", (ii) the function relating N2O emission to applied N (exponential or linear function), (iii) fixed or random background (i.e. in the absence of N application) N2O emission and (iv) fixed or random applied N effect. We calculated ranges of uncertainty on N2O emissions from a subset of these models, and compared them with the uncertainty ranges currently used in the IPCC-Tier 1 method. The exponential models outperformed the linear models, and models including one or two random effects outperformed those including fixed effects only. The use of an exponential function rather than a linear function has an important practical consequence: the emission factor is not constant and increases as a function of applied N. Emission factors estimated using the exponential function were lower than 1% when the amount of N applied was below 160 kg N ha(-1). Our uncertainty analysis shows that the uncertainty range currently used by the IPCC-Tier 1 method could be reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
Bernadier AB, 2012, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V18, P928
[3]   Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils [J].
Bouwman, AF .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1996, 46 (01) :53-70
[4]   General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations [J].
Brooks, SP ;
Gelman, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 1998, 7 (04) :434-455
[5]  
Burnham KP., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
[6]   N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels [J].
Crutzen, P. J. ;
Mosier, A. R. ;
Smith, K. A. ;
Winiwarter, W. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (02) :389-395
[7]  
Davidian M.Giltinan., 1995, NONLINEAR MIXED EFFE
[8]   The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860 [J].
Davidson, Eric A. .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2009, 2 (09) :659-662
[9]   Estimating uncertainty in N2O emissions from US cropland soils [J].
Del Grosso, S. J. ;
Ogle, S. M. ;
Parton, W. J. ;
Breidt, F. J. .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2010, 24
[10]   Global scale DAYCENT model analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies for cropped soils [J].
Del Grosso, Stephen J. ;
Ojima, Dennis S. ;
Parton, William J. ;
Stehfest, Elke ;
Heistermann, Maik ;
DeAngelo, Benjamin ;
Rose, Steven .
GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2009, 67 (1-2) :44-50