A tiered approach to assessing children's exposure: a review of methods and data

被引:21
作者
Armstrong, TW
Zaleski, RT
Konkel, WJ
Parkerton, TJ
机构
[1] ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA
[2] ExxonMobil Chem Europe, B-1831 Machelen, Belgium
关键词
children; children's health; children's environment; chemical exposure; exposure assessment; environmental exposure;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00490-8
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
From a public health view, there are many important issues to improving children's and adolescent's health, for example, prenatal and childhood nutrition, immunizations. infectious disease control, and drug/alcohol/tobacco control. There has been increasing emphasis worldwide on protecting children from adverse health effects due to environmental factors, including chemicals. For well-studied contaminants (e.g. lead) the risks to children are reasonably known and appropriate risk management actions, in a public health context, can be undertaken. For a number of other chemicals, hazard and exposure data are less complete, and risk-based priorities are consequently less substantive. The US EPA's Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program proposal prompted additional efforts to develop and improve methods and data for assessing children's exposure. The goal is to efficiently identify the substances and conditions that present the highest potential risks to children, so that resources can be applied efficiently to assure their health improvement. The methods we illustrate use an iterative (tiered) approach for (a) screening level and (b) more detailed exposure assessments relevant to children. We also review and reference the key information sources available for such assessments and analyze the information and method's strengths and limitations. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 119
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children
[2]   A tiered approach for assessing children's exposure [J].
Armstrong, TW ;
Hushka, LJ ;
Tell, JG ;
Zaleski, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (06) :469-474
[3]   Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment [J].
Dourson, ML ;
Felter, SP ;
Robinson, D .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 24 (02) :108-120
[4]  
Gephart LA, 1994, J SOIL CONTAM, V3, P47
[5]  
Gregory J. R., 1995, REPORT DIET NUTR SUR, V1
[6]   The practice of exposure assessment: A state-of-the-art review (Reprinted from Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 4th edition, 2001) [J].
Paustenbach, DJ .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART B-CRITICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 3 (03) :179-291
[7]  
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1997, EXP FACT HDB
[8]  
*US EPA, 2001, WORKSH MICR MACR ACT
[9]  
*US EPA, 2001, VOL CHILDR CHEM EV P
[10]  
*US EPA, 2001, SUMM REP TECHN WORKS