Application of MFL on Girth-Weld Defect Detection of Oil and Gas Pipelines

被引:19
作者
Dai, L. S. [1 ]
Feng, Q. S. [2 ]
Sutherland, J. [3 ]
Wang, T. [2 ]
Sha, S. Y. [2 ]
Wang, F. X. [4 ]
Wang, D. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina Pipeline Co, 408 Xinhua Rd, Langfang 065000, Peoples R China
[3] Baker Hughes, 17021 Aldine Westfield Rd, Houston, TX 77073 USA
[4] PetroChina Pipeline R&D Ctr, 51 Jinguang Rd, Langfang 065000, Peoples R China
关键词
Girth weld (GW); Defect; Magnetic flux leakage 4 (MFL4); Pull-through test; Excavation;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000497
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Globally, the integrity of girth weld (GW) of oil and gas pipelines has increased as a concern due to failures with high consequences. A primary integrity issue to pipelines considers defects originating during field construction but over time may also be subject to external loads and stresses due to earth movement. GW defects in newly built pipelines are also assumed to exist but would be much smaller in size, and more difficult to detect, which motivated the investigation into minimum defect detection levels of the inspection technologies. Research objectives of this paper are to characterize and summarize the applicability of inline inspection (ILI) technology of magnetic flux leakage 4 (MFL4) for inspection of defects related to pipeline GWs. Pull-through test and infield site excavations of operational pipelines have been collected and used for detection, internal/external (int/ext) identification, and sizing quantification. It can be concluded that the MFL4 technique is generally sensitive to lack of fusion or penetration, deep undercut, local thinning with results of both pull test and field data; while not sensitive to closed or very narrow small dimension cracks (narrower than 1 mm, less than 2 mm deep) as was observed in this study. (c) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
PII (Pipeline Integrity Inspection) Pipeline Solutions, 2014, SMART WAY PIP INT NE
[12]  
Salama MM, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2012, VOL 6, P247
[13]  
Skow J., 2015, In-line Inspection Crack Tool Performance Evaluation PR-244-133731 R01
[14]  
Skow J., 2018, In-Line Inspection Crack Tool Performance Evaluation Phase II PR-244-163728
[15]  
Sutherland J, 2010, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE 2010, VOL 1, P225
[16]  
Wang F, 2011, P INT C PIP TRENCHL, P981
[17]  
Wang T., 2015, OIL GAS STORAGE T, V7, P694, DOI 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.07.003
[18]  
Wang T., 2017, Oil Gas Storage Transp, V36, P1258, DOI DOI 10.6047/J.ISSN.1000-8241.2017.11.005