Response Time Distribution Analysis of Semantic and Response Interference in a Manual Response Stroop Task

被引:13
作者
Hasshim, Nabil [1 ,2 ]
Downes, Michelle [2 ]
Bate, Sarah [1 ]
Parris, Benjamin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Poole, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Psychol, Newman Bldg, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
Stroop interference; response conflict; response time distribution; manual responding; WORD READING EVIDENCE; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; STIMULUS-STIMULUS; CONFLICT; COMPONENTS; DEMENTIA; DECISION; CORTEX; POWER; WALD;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169/a000445
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous analyses of response time distributions have shown that the Stroop effect is observed in the mode (mu) and standard deviation (sigma) of the normal part of the distribution, as well as its tail (tau). Specifically, interference related to semantic and response processes has been suggested to specifically affect the mode and tail, respectively. However, only one study in the literature has directly manipulated semantic interference, and none manipulating response interference. The present research aims to address this gap by manipulating both semantic and response interference in a manual response Stroop task, and examining how these components of Stroop interference affect the response time distribution. Ex-Gaussian analysis showed both semantic and response conflict to only affect tau. Analyzing the distribution by rank-ordered response times (Vincentizing) showed converging results as the magnitude of both semantic and response conflict increased with slower response times. Additionally, response conflict appeared earlier on the distribution compared to semantic conflict. These findings further highlight the difficulty in attributing specific psychological processes to different parameters (i.e., mu, sigma, and tau). The effect of different response modalities on the makeup of Stroop interference is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: Brain activity and reaction time distributions [J].
Aarts, Esther ;
Roelofs, Ardi ;
van Turennout, Miranda .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (10) :2089-2099
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Gene-Calc
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANIMAL BEHAV MONOGRA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, RESPONSE TIMES THEIR
[5]   Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Silvert, Laetitia ;
Spatola, Nicolas ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2018, 189 :54-62
[6]   Automaticity of Word Reading: Evidence From the Semantic Stroop Paradigm [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (05) :343-348
[7]   Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: Evidence from the semantically based Stroop task [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (03) :521-527
[8]   Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect [J].
Augustinova, Maria ;
Flaudias, Valentin ;
Ferrand, Ludovic .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2010, 17 (06) :827-833
[9]   The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[10]   Moving Beyond the Mean in Studies of Mental Chronometry: The Power of Response Time Distributional Analyses [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (03) :160-166