Mapping of Model Estimates of Phytoplankton Biomass from Remote Sensing Data

被引:2
作者
Pak, Svetlana Ya [1 ]
Abakumov, Alexander I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Far Eastern Branch, Inst Automat & Control Proc, 5 Radio Str, Vladivostok 690041, Russia
来源
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE RESEARCH OF BIODIVERSITY | 2019年
关键词
Mathematical model; Phytoplankton; Satellite; Remote data; Primary production; Assimilation function;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-11720-7_11
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Phytoplankton is the lowest level of the trophic chain determining the aquatic ecosystem productivity. Information about the surface phytoplankton distribution over a large area can be obtained by the modern remote methods. Satellite signal penetrates only into the upper layer, so these methods are limited. Plant biomass volume located under the surface water layer differs significantly from the remote data. Vertical model of phytoplankton functioning based on the concept of fitness function is used to reconstruct the integral biomass in the whole water column under a unit area. Phytoplankton community is considered under its aspiration to occupy the niche most favorable for life. The community growth rate coincides with the specific growth rate of phytoplankton. The model solution reduces to solving the Cauchy problem for a system of ordinary differential equations with the remote sensing data as the initial conditions. The remote sensing data of the Sea of Japan and Issyk-Kul Lake are used for the model testing. The model solution visualization gives an idea of the spatial distribution of biomass within the entire zone where the photosynthesis takes place.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 79
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Incorporating remote sensing-based ET estimates into the Community Land Model version 4.5
    Wang, Dagang
    Wang, Guiling
    Parr, Dana T.
    Liao, Weilin
    Xia, Youlong
    Fu, Congsheng
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 21 (07) : 3557 - 3577
  • [42] Subpixel Mapping Based on Multisource Remote Sensing Fusion Data for Land-Cover Classes
    Wang, Peng
    Wang, Yulan
    Zhang, Lei
    Ni, Kang
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2022, 19
  • [43] Cost-benefit analysis of remote sensing data types for mapping mosquito breeding sites
    Kenyeres, Zoltan
    Bauer, Norbert
    Bertalan, Laszlo
    Szabo, Gergely
    Markus, Andras
    Saringer-Kenyeres, Tamas
    Szabo, Szilard
    SPATIAL INFORMATION RESEARCH, 2023, 31 (04) : 419 - 428
  • [44] Evaluation of remote sensing precipitation estimates over Saudi Arabia
    Sultana, Rebeka
    Nasrollahi, Nasrin
    JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 151 : 90 - 103
  • [45] REMOTE SENSING DATA IN MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT
    Nydrle, Jaroslav
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-STAVEBNI OBZOR, 2021, 30 (04): : 945 - 961
  • [46] Hydrologic Model Calibration With Remote Sensing Data Products in Global Large Basins
    Liu, Xiaomang
    Yang, Kun
    Ferreira, Vagner G.
    Bai, Peng
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (12)
  • [47] Remote Sensing Role in Emergency Mapping for Disaster Response
    Boccardo, Piero
    Tonolo, Fabio Giulio
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 5: URBAN GEOLOGY, SUSTAINABLE PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE EXPLOITATION, 2015, : 17 - 24
  • [48] Estimation of primary production of subhumid rangelands from remote sensing data
    Paruelo, Jose M.
    Oesterheld, Martin
    Di Bella, Carlos M.
    Arzadum, Martin
    Lafontaine, Juan
    Cahuepe, Miguel
    Rebella, Cesar M.
    APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2000, 3 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [49] Estimation of bioclimatic variables of Mongolia derived from remote sensing data
    Otgonbayar, Munkhdulam
    Atzberger, Clement
    Sumiya, Erdenesukh
    Dalantai, Sainbayar
    Chambers, Jonathan
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 16 (02) : 323 - 339
  • [50] A Model for Deriving the Spectral Backscattering Properties of Particles in Inland and Marine Waters From In Situ and Remote Sensing Data
    Vadakke-Chanat, Sayoob
    Shanmugam, Palanisamy
    Ahn, Yu-Hwan
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (03): : 1461 - 1476