Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism

被引:25
|
作者
Ueki, Koichiro [1 ]
Okabe, Katsuhiko [1 ]
Mukozawa, Aya [1 ]
Miyazaki, Mao [1 ]
Marukawa, Kohei
Hashiba, Yukari
Nakagawa, Kiyomasa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Etsuhide [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Grad Sch Med, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2009年 / 108卷 / 05期
关键词
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA; HUMAN JAW MUSCLES; BITE-FORCE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; FACIAL MORPHOLOGY; SETBACK OSTEOTOMY; CONTACT AREA; STRENGTH; HEAD; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.042
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in patients with mandibular prognathism. Patients and methods. The study group consisted of 26 patients with mandibular prognathism. All patients underwent bilateral SSRO as well as 3-dimensional computed tomography on which the masseter muscle, ramus, and condyle were measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperation. Occlusal force and contact area were also recorded with pressure-sensitive sheets. Results. In the cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle, there were no significant differences between the pre- and postoperative status. However, postoperative ramus width and area were significantly larger than preoperative values (P<.0001). Postoperative right condylar area was significantly larger than the preoperative value (P=.0120). Occlusal force and contact area 1 year after surgery were significantly larger than the preoperative values (P=.0016, P=.0190). Conclusion. This study suggested that the masseter muscle area did not significantly differ from preoperative status 1 year after SSRO, although occlusal force, contact area, and ramus area and width increased significantly 1 year after SSRO. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:679-686)
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 686
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sonographic Evaluation of Bone Formation After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Miura, Kei-ichiro
    Yoshida, Masashi
    Yamaguchi, Kojiro
    Yoshida, Reiko
    Asahina, Izumi
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (02) : 395 - 400
  • [32] Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis
    Kang, Hyo-Sun
    Han, Jeong Joon
    Jung, Seunggon
    Kook, Min-Suk
    Park, Hong-Ju
    Oh, Hee-Kyun
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 130 (05): : 505 - 514
  • [33] Morphological Changes in the Temporomandibular Joint Before and After Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy of the Mandible for Skeletal Mandibular Protrusion
    Enami, Koji
    Yamada, Kazuhiro
    Kageyama, Toru
    Taguchi, Akira
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2013, 31 (02): : 123 - 132
  • [34] Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study
    de Assis, Gleysson Matias
    Borborema dos Santos, Victor Diniz
    Monteiro Lourenco Queiroz, Salomao Israel
    Germano, Adriano Rocha
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 26 (04): : 625 - 631
  • [35] In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback
    Oh, Ji-Su
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (02) : 186 - 191
  • [36] Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study
    Gleysson Matias de Assis
    Victor Diniz Borborema dos Santos
    Salomão Israel Monteiro Lourenço Queiroz
    Adriano Rocha Germano
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022, 26 : 625 - 631
  • [37] Ambulatory sagittal split ramus osteotomy: strategy for enhanced recovery after surgery
    Hattori, Y.
    Uda, H.
    Niu, A.
    Yoshimura, K.
    Sugawara, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (04) : 476 - 480
  • [38] Impact of the lateral skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry
    Hasegawa, S.
    Sasaki, J.
    Nakao, H.
    Tomimatsu, M.
    Yamamoto, S.
    Watanabe, S.
    Miyabe, S.
    Miyachi, H.
    Goto, M.
    JPRAS OPEN, 2023, 38 : 36 - 47
  • [39] 3D simulation of interosseous interference in sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry
    Udayakumar, Santhiya Iswarya Vinothini
    Kim, Dohyoung
    Choi, So-Young
    Kwon, Tae-Geon
    MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 45 (01)
  • [40] Evaluation of treatment with unilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy in patients with condylar osteochondroma and mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective case series
    Xia, Liang
    Jiang, Wenxin
    Yao, Kan
    Wei, Silong
    Yu, Wenwen
    Lu, Xiaofeng
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 51 (02) : 123 - 129