Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism

被引:25
|
作者
Ueki, Koichiro [1 ]
Okabe, Katsuhiko [1 ]
Mukozawa, Aya [1 ]
Miyazaki, Mao [1 ]
Marukawa, Kohei
Hashiba, Yukari
Nakagawa, Kiyomasa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Etsuhide [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Grad Sch Med, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2009年 / 108卷 / 05期
关键词
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA; HUMAN JAW MUSCLES; BITE-FORCE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; FACIAL MORPHOLOGY; SETBACK OSTEOTOMY; CONTACT AREA; STRENGTH; HEAD; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.042
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in patients with mandibular prognathism. Patients and methods. The study group consisted of 26 patients with mandibular prognathism. All patients underwent bilateral SSRO as well as 3-dimensional computed tomography on which the masseter muscle, ramus, and condyle were measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperation. Occlusal force and contact area were also recorded with pressure-sensitive sheets. Results. In the cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle, there were no significant differences between the pre- and postoperative status. However, postoperative ramus width and area were significantly larger than preoperative values (P<.0001). Postoperative right condylar area was significantly larger than the preoperative value (P=.0120). Occlusal force and contact area 1 year after surgery were significantly larger than the preoperative values (P=.0016, P=.0190). Conclusion. This study suggested that the masseter muscle area did not significantly differ from preoperative status 1 year after SSRO, although occlusal force, contact area, and ramus area and width increased significantly 1 year after SSRO. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:679-686)
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 686
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes of Mandibular Movement Tracings After the Correction of Mandibular Protrusion by Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Wang, Dahui
    Fu, Hongjun
    Zeng, Rongsheng
    Yang, Xiaoping
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (10) : 2238 - 2244
  • [22] Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism
    Paeng, Jun-Young
    Hong, Jongrak
    Kim, Chang-Soo
    Kim, Myung-Jin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 40 (08) : 660 - 664
  • [23] Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
    Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed
    Ellis, Edward, III
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (07) : 1360 - 1371
  • [24] Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kuroyanagi, N.
    Miyachi, H.
    Ochiai, S.
    Kamiya, N.
    Kanazawa, T.
    Nagao, T.
    Shimozato, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (07) : 814 - 822
  • [25] Position of the mandibular canal before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a cone beam computed tomographic study
    Yamashita, F. C.
    Iwaki, L. C., V
    Yamashita, A. L.
    Tolentino, E. S.
    Verginio, V. E. O.
    Moraes, T. E. N. T.
    Chicarelli, M.
    Iwaki Filho, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [26] Change in lip closing force in Classes II and III malocclusion before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with Le Fort I osteotomy
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Moroi, Akinori
    Hotta, Asami
    Fukaya, Kenichi
    Hiraide, Ryota
    Takayama, Akihiro
    Tsunoda, Tatsuya
    Saito, Yuki
    Iguchi, Ran
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Ikawa, Hiroumi
    Ueki, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (09) : 1415 - 1418
  • [27] Effects of sagittal split Ramus osteotomy on condylar position and Ramal orientation in patients with mandibular asymmetry
    Meral, Salih Eren
    Koc, Onur
    Tosun, Emre
    Tuez, Hakan H.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [28] Intraosseous xanthoma simultaneously treated with mandibular prognathism using sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the mandible: a case report and literature review
    Lee, Yong Sun
    Youn, Sung Bin
    Choi, Sul Gi
    Do, Kyung Lok
    Namis, Sultan
    Seo, Byoung-Moo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2025, 51 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [29] Long-term evaluation of swallowing function before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Namaki, S.
    Maekawa, N.
    Iwata, J.
    Sawada, K.
    Namaki, M.
    Bjornland, T.
    Yonehara, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (07) : 856 - 861
  • [30] Morphologic Features of the Mandibular Ramus Associated With Increased Surgical Time and Blood Loss in Sagittal Split-Ramus Osteotomy
    Kuroyanagi, Norio
    Miyachi, Hitoshi
    Kanazawa, Teruyuki
    Kamiya, Noboru
    Nagao, Toru
    Shimozato, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 71 (01) : E31 - E41