Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism

被引:25
|
作者
Ueki, Koichiro [1 ]
Okabe, Katsuhiko [1 ]
Mukozawa, Aya [1 ]
Miyazaki, Mao [1 ]
Marukawa, Kohei
Hashiba, Yukari
Nakagawa, Kiyomasa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Etsuhide [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Grad Sch Med, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2009年 / 108卷 / 05期
关键词
CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA; HUMAN JAW MUSCLES; BITE-FORCE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; FACIAL MORPHOLOGY; SETBACK OSTEOTOMY; CONTACT AREA; STRENGTH; HEAD; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.042
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in patients with mandibular prognathism. Patients and methods. The study group consisted of 26 patients with mandibular prognathism. All patients underwent bilateral SSRO as well as 3-dimensional computed tomography on which the masseter muscle, ramus, and condyle were measured preoperatively and at 1 year postoperation. Occlusal force and contact area were also recorded with pressure-sensitive sheets. Results. In the cross-sectional area of the masseter muscle, there were no significant differences between the pre- and postoperative status. However, postoperative ramus width and area were significantly larger than preoperative values (P<.0001). Postoperative right condylar area was significantly larger than the preoperative value (P=.0120). Occlusal force and contact area 1 year after surgery were significantly larger than the preoperative values (P=.0016, P=.0190). Conclusion. This study suggested that the masseter muscle area did not significantly differ from preoperative status 1 year after SSRO, although occlusal force, contact area, and ramus area and width increased significantly 1 year after SSRO. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:679-686)
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 686
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Changes in temporomandibular joint and ramus after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism patients with and without asymmetry
    Ueki, Koichiro
    Moroi, Akinori
    Sotobori, Megumi
    Ishihara, Yuri
    Marukawa, Kohei
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Kato, Koroku
    Kawashiri, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 40 (08) : 821 - 827
  • [2] The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Moroi, Akinori
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Iguchi, Ran
    Ikawa, Hiroumi
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Hotta, Asami
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Saida, Yuriko
    Ueki, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (09) : 1743 - 1748
  • [3] Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an alternative for some cases of asymmetric mandibular prognathism
    Farina, R.
    Mebus, C.
    Mayer, C.
    Torrealba, R.
    Moreno, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (05) : 630 - 637
  • [4] Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial
    Leung, Y. Y.
    Wang, R.
    Wong, N. S. M.
    Li, D. T. S.
    Au, S. W.
    Choi, W. S.
    Su, Y. -x.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 933 - 939
  • [5] Changes and Remodeling of Intersegmental Interferences following Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Patients with Mandibular Prognathism
    Jeon, Min-A
    Sandor, George K.
    Ko, Edward Chengchuan
    Kim, Yong-Deok
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [6] Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite
    Yoshioka, Izumi
    Tanaka, Tatsurou
    Habu, Manabu
    Oda, Masafumi
    Kodama, Masaaki
    Kokuryo, Shinya
    Kito, Shinji
    Wakasugi-Sato, Nao
    Matsumoto-Takeda, Shinobu
    Seta, Yuji
    Fukudome, Yuki
    Tominaga, Kazuhiro
    Sakoda, Sumio
    Morimoto, Yasuhiro
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 115 (04): : 455 - 465
  • [7] Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry
    Ohba, Seigo
    Nakao, Noriko
    Kawasaki, Takako
    Miura, Kei-ichiro
    Minamizato, Tokutaro
    Koga, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Noriaki
    Asahina, Izumi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (08): : 920 - 926
  • [8] Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Yamamoto T.
    Fujii-Abe K.
    Fukayama H.
    Kawahara H.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017, 21 (3) : 313 - 319
  • [9] Modification of the Sagittal Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus: Mobilizing Vertical Osteotomy of the Internal Ramus Segment
    Ricard, Daniel
    Ferri, Joel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (08) : 1691 - 1699
  • [10] Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism
    Fang, B.
    Shen, G. -F.
    Yang, C.
    Wu, Y.
    Feng, Y. -M.
    Mao, L. -X.
    Xia, Y. -H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (07) : 726 - 730