Fair welfare maximization

被引:8
|
作者
Goel, Ashish [1 ]
Meyerson, Adam [2 ]
Weber, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fairness; Inequality; Lorenz-dominance; Social justice; INEQUALITY; EQUITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-008-0406-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the general problem of finding fair constrained resource allocations. As a criterion for fairness we propose an inequality index, termed "fairness ratio," the maximization of which produces Lorenz-undominated, Pareto-optimal allocations. The fairness ratio does not depend on the choice of any particular social welfare function, and hence it can be used for an a priori evaluation of any given feasible resource allocation. The fairness ratio for an allocation provides a bound on the discrepancy between this allocation and any other feasible allocation with respect to a large class of social welfare functions. We provide a simple representation of the fairness ratio as well as a general method that can be used to directly determine optimal fair allocations. For general convex environments, we provide a fundamental lower bound for the optimal fairness ratio and show that as the population size increases, the optimal fairness ratio decreases at most logarithmically in what we call the "inhomogeneity" of the problem. Our method yields a unique and "balanced" fair optimum for an important class of problems with linear budget constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 494
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Income comparison and happiness: The role of fair income distribution
    Chen, Yongwei
    Fu, Dahai
    Ye, Xinyue
    AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2021, 60 (01) : 41 - 63
  • [32] Designing a safe and fair network for hazmat road transportation
    Yin, Haodong
    Sun, Huijun
    Peng, Shanshan
    Wu, Jianjun
    Ge, Ying-en
    Chen, Yizhou
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & SECURITY, 2020, 12 (04) : 482 - 500
  • [33] Fair and Efficient Weighted Sum Rate Maximization for Multi-Rate Secondary Users in Cognitive Radio Network
    Chowdhury, Sakil Ahmed
    Benslimane, Abderrahim
    Akhter, Farzana
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC), 2017,
  • [34] Toward Fair Maximization of Energy Efficiency in Multiple UAS-Aided Networks: A Game-Theoretic Methodology
    Abdulla, Ahmed E. A. A.
    Fadlullah, Zubair Md.
    Nishiyama, Hiroki
    Kato, Nei
    Ono, Fumie
    Miura, Ryu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 14 (01) : 305 - 316
  • [35] REGRESSIVE WELFARE EFFECTS OF HOUSING BUBBLES
    Graczyk, Andrew
    Phan, Toan
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2021, 25 (08) : 2102 - 2127
  • [36] Is The Sky the Limit? Fair Executive Pay as Performance Rises
    Burak, Esra
    SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2018, 65 (02) : 211 - 230
  • [37] Rational and Fair
    Ockenfels, Axel
    Raub, Werner
    KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2010, : 119 - +
  • [38] Realistic energy commitments in peer-to-peer transactive market with risk adjusted prosumer welfare maximization
    Mohan, Vivek
    Bu, Siqi
    Jisma, M.
    Rijinlal, V. C.
    Thirumala, Karthik
    Thomas, Mini Shaji
    Xu, Zhao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2021, 124
  • [39] FAIR INNINGS
    Bognar, Greg
    BIOETHICS, 2015, 29 (04) : 251 - 261
  • [40] Individual social welfare preferences: An experimental study
    Hong, Hao
    Ding, Jianfeng
    Yao, Yang
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 57 : 89 - 97