Fair welfare maximization

被引:8
|
作者
Goel, Ashish [1 ]
Meyerson, Adam [2 ]
Weber, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fairness; Inequality; Lorenz-dominance; Social justice; INEQUALITY; EQUITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-008-0406-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the general problem of finding fair constrained resource allocations. As a criterion for fairness we propose an inequality index, termed "fairness ratio," the maximization of which produces Lorenz-undominated, Pareto-optimal allocations. The fairness ratio does not depend on the choice of any particular social welfare function, and hence it can be used for an a priori evaluation of any given feasible resource allocation. The fairness ratio for an allocation provides a bound on the discrepancy between this allocation and any other feasible allocation with respect to a large class of social welfare functions. We provide a simple representation of the fairness ratio as well as a general method that can be used to directly determine optimal fair allocations. For general convex environments, we provide a fundamental lower bound for the optimal fairness ratio and show that as the population size increases, the optimal fairness ratio decreases at most logarithmically in what we call the "inhomogeneity" of the problem. Our method yields a unique and "balanced" fair optimum for an important class of problems with linear budget constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 494
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Fair Governance: On Inequality, Power and Democracy
    Barucca, Paolo
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 40 (04): : 765 - 770
  • [22] A Fair Governance: On Inequality, Power and Democracy
    Paolo Barucca
    Topoi, 2021, 40 : 765 - 770
  • [23] Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study
    Cappelen, Alexander W.
    Eichele, Tom
    Hugdahl, Kenneth
    Specht, Karsten
    Sorensen, Erik O.
    Tungodden, Bertil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (43) : 15368 - 15372
  • [24] A quantitative method for benchmarking fair income distribution
    Sitthiyot, Thitithep
    Holasut, Kanyarat
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (09)
  • [25] The heterogeneous welfare effects of business cycles
    Cho, Daeha
    Ma, Eunseong
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 153
  • [26] Welfare Analysis with Heterogeneous Risk Preferences
    Eden, Maya
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (12) : 4574 - 4613
  • [27] Inequality and welfare: Some axiomatic characterizations
    Chakravarty, Satya R.
    Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa
    Liu Qingbin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2019, 15 (02) : 153 - 168
  • [28] A model of social welfare improving transfers
    Magdalou, Brice
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2021, 196
  • [29] On the Distribution of the Welfare Losses of Large Recessions
    Krueger, Dirk
    Mitman, Kurt
    Perri, Fabrizio
    ADVANCES IN ECONOMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, VOL 2, 2017, : 143 - 184
  • [30] Fair pay dispersion: A regulatory focus theory view
    Park, Tae-Youn
    Kim, Seongsu
    Sung, Li-Kuo
    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2017, 142 : 1 - 11