Fair welfare maximization

被引:8
|
作者
Goel, Ashish [1 ]
Meyerson, Adam [2 ]
Weber, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Comp Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fairness; Inequality; Lorenz-dominance; Social justice; INEQUALITY; EQUITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-008-0406-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider the general problem of finding fair constrained resource allocations. As a criterion for fairness we propose an inequality index, termed "fairness ratio," the maximization of which produces Lorenz-undominated, Pareto-optimal allocations. The fairness ratio does not depend on the choice of any particular social welfare function, and hence it can be used for an a priori evaluation of any given feasible resource allocation. The fairness ratio for an allocation provides a bound on the discrepancy between this allocation and any other feasible allocation with respect to a large class of social welfare functions. We provide a simple representation of the fairness ratio as well as a general method that can be used to directly determine optimal fair allocations. For general convex environments, we provide a fundamental lower bound for the optimal fairness ratio and show that as the population size increases, the optimal fairness ratio decreases at most logarithmically in what we call the "inhomogeneity" of the problem. Our method yields a unique and "balanced" fair optimum for an important class of problems with linear budget constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 494
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fair welfare maximization
    Ashish Goel
    Adam Meyerson
    Thomas A. Weber
    Economic Theory, 2009, 41
  • [2] Participatory Budgeting: Fairness and Welfare Maximization
    Sreedurga, Gogulapati
    MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, EUMAS 2022, 2022, 13442 : 439 - 443
  • [3] A New Approach to Fair Distribution of Welfare
    Babaioff, Moshe
    Feige, Uriel
    WEB AND INTERNET ECONOMICS, WINE 2019, 2019, 11920 : 71 - 84
  • [4] Equitability and welfare maximization for allocating indivisible items
    Sun, Ankang
    Chen, Bo
    Doan, Xuan Vinh
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [5] Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints
    Argyris, Nikolaos
    Karsu, Ozlem
    Yavuz, Mirel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 297 (02) : 560 - 578
  • [6] Fair Resource Allocation for System Throughput Maximization in Mobile Edge Computing
    Zhu, Zhengfa
    Peng, Jun
    Gu, Xin
    Li, Heng
    Liu, Kaiyang
    Zhou, Zhuofu
    Liu, Weirong
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 5332 - 5340
  • [7] Equity in Retirement: Are All Australians Getting a Fair Deal?
    Asher, Anthony
    ECONOMIC AND LABOUR RELATIONS REVIEW, 2011, 22 (03) : 65 - 84
  • [8] When is inequality fair? An experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency
    Akbas, Merve
    Ariely, Dan
    Yuksel, Sevgi
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2019, 161 : 114 - 127
  • [9] When Is Inequality Fair?
    Gideon Elford
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2018, 21 : 1205 - 1218
  • [10] When Is Inequality Fair?
    Elford, Gideon
    ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2018, 21 (05) : 1205 - 1218