Power and the Practice of Transnational Private Regulation

被引:51
作者
Bartley, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Sociol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Transnational governance; global standards; contestation; corporate social responsibility; multi-stakeholder initiatives; regulatory intermediaries; global production networks; theory; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporations, NGOs, and private regulatory initiatives have taken on functions once assumed to be the domain of the state and inter-governmental organisations. While researchers are racing to assess the impacts of private rules, theoretical statements remain focused on the design, legitimation, and intermediation of private initiatives or the hegemony of neoliberal governance. This paper instead highlights the grounded practices of transnational private regulation, and it argues that much about these practices can be explained through a straightforward (but multi-faceted) analysis of power. Specifically, unpacking the practice of private regulation requires a focus on (1) the distinctive power struggles that animate different types of standard-setting projects (which should not be reduced to a single logic), (2) the saturation of private regulation with corporate power (not merely the capture of particular intermediaries), and (3) the construction of compliance in ways that accommodate state powers at the point of implementation. These points are illustrated with examples from research on private rules for land and labour and accounts of standards wars more generally.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 202
页数:15
相关论文
共 91 条
[21]  
Clapp J, 2009, FOOD HEALTH ENVIRON, V4, P1
[22]   Fair trade certification as oversight: an analysis of fair trade international and the small producers' symbol [J].
Clark, Patrick ;
Hussey, Ian .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 21 (02) :220-237
[23]  
Conroy Michael., 2007, Branded: How the Certification Revolution is Transforming Global Corporations
[24]  
Culpepper PepperD., 2010, Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan
[25]   Is the Power of Brand-Focused Activism Rising? The Case of Tropical Deforestation [J].
Dauvergne, Peter .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 26 (02) :135-155
[26]   Rents, Power and Governance in Global Value Chains [J].
Davis, Dennis ;
Kaplinsky, Raphael ;
Morris, Mike .
JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (01) :43-71
[27]   Marketing and selling transnational 'judges' and global 'experts': building the credibility of (quasi)judicial regulation [J].
Dezalay, Yves ;
Garth, Bryant G. .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 8 (01) :113-130
[28]   Field Recognition and the State Prerogative: Why Democratic Legitimation Recedes in Private Transnational Sustainability Regulation [J].
Dingwerth, Klaus .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 5 (01) :75-84
[29]   Does Compliance Pay? Social Standards and Firm-Level Trade [J].
Distelhorst, Greg ;
Locke, Richard M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (03) :695-711
[30]  
Djelic ML, 2006, TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE: INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS OF REGULATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511488665.002