Accuracy of deep learning to differentiate the histopathological grading of meningiomas on MR images: A preliminary study

被引:38
作者
Banzato, Tommaso [1 ]
Causin, Francesco [2 ]
Della Puppa, Alessandro [3 ]
Cester, Giacomo [2 ]
Mazzai, Linda [2 ]
Zotti, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Anim Med Prod & Hlth, Legnaro, Italy
[2] Padua Univ Hosp, Neuroradiol Unit, Padua, Italy
[3] Padua Univ Hosp, Neurosurg Unit, Via Padova, Padua, Italy
关键词
meningioma; deep learning; apparent diffusion coefficient; postcontrast; grading; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26723
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Grading of meningiomas is important in the choice of the most effective treatment for each patient. Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) in the differentiation of the histopathological grading of meningiomas from MR images. Study Type Retrospective. Population In all, 117 meningioma-affected patients, 79 World Health Organization [WHO] Grade I, 32 WHO Grade II, and 6 WHO Grade III. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5 T, 3.0 T postcontrast enhanced T-1 W (PCT1W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (b values of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm(2)). Assessment WHO Grade II and WHO Grade III meningiomas were considered a single category. The diagnostic accuracy of the pretrained Inception-V3 and AlexNet DCNNs was tested on ADC maps and PCT1W images separately. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used to asses DCNN performance. Statistical Test Leave-one-out cross-validation. Results The application of the Inception-V3 DCNN on ADC maps provided the best diagnostic accuracy results, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.98). Remarkably, only 1/38 WHO Grade II-III and 7/79 WHO Grade I lesions were misclassified by this model. The application of AlexNet on ADC maps had a low discriminating accuracy, with an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76) and a high misclassification rate on both WHO Grade I and WHO Grade II-III cases. The discriminating accuracy of both DCNNs on postcontrast T1W images was low, with Inception-V3 displaying an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76) and AlexNet displaying an AUC of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.45-0.64). Data Conclusion DCNNs can accurately discriminate between benign and atypical/anaplastic meningiomas from ADC maps but not from PCT1W images. Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1152-1159.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1159
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J AM COLL RADIOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, KYOTO FURITSU KAIYO
[3]  
[Anonymous], IEEE T MED IMAGING
[4]  
[Anonymous], CLIN CANC RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], AM J NEURORADIOL
[6]   Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls [J].
Arbabshirani, Mohammad R. ;
Plis, Sergey ;
Sui, Jing ;
Calhoun, Vince D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 145 :137-165
[7]   Development of a deep convolutional neural network to predict grading of canine meningiomas from magnetic resonance images [J].
Banzato, T. ;
Cherubini, G. B. ;
Atzori, M. ;
Zotti, A. .
VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2018, 235 :90-92
[8]   Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric [J].
Boughorbel, Sabri ;
Jarray, Fethi ;
El-Anbari, Mohammed .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06)
[9]   Using machine learning for sequence-level automated MRI protocol selection in neuroradiology [J].
Brown, Andrew D. ;
Marotta, Thomas R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 25 (05) :568-571
[10]   Deep-Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Accurately Classify Genetic Mutations in Gliomas [J].
Chang, P. ;
Grinband, J. ;
Weinberg, B. D. ;
Bardis, M. ;
Khy, M. ;
Cadena, G. ;
Su, M. -Y. ;
Cha, S. ;
Filippi, C. G. ;
Bota, D. ;
Baldi, P. ;
Poisson, L. M. ;
Jain, R. ;
Chow, D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (07) :1201-1207