Comparing Microleakage and the Layering Methods of Silorane-based Resin Composite in Wide Class II MOD Cavities

被引:54
作者
Bagis, Y. H. [1 ]
Baltacioglu, I. H. [1 ]
Kahyaogullari, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
POLYMERIZATION SHRINKAGE STRESS; FILLING TECHNIQUES; BOND STRENGTH; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.2341/08-073-LR
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This in vitro study compared the effects of different layering techniques and different monomer-based composites on microleakage. Method and Materials: Thirty-two freshly extracted caries-free human third molars were used. A wide mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavity was prepared in each third molar, with the occlusal dimension being approximately two-thirds of the intercuspal. dimension, and the cervical limit of one proximal box was stopped 1 mm below and the other 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. The cavities were filled with a methacrylate-based nanohybrid composite (Grandio, VoCo) and a silorane-based microhybrid composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE). All samples were subjected to 1000 thermal cycles of 5 degrees C/55 degrees C in water with a 30-second dwell time and, after the procedure, the teeth were immersed in a 0.5% basic fuchsin dye at 23 degrees C for 24 hours. Sectioned samples were examined under a stereomicroscope (Leica MZ12, Leica Microsystems), and microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: No microleakage was observed for silorane-based resin composite restorations. The nanohybrid-based resin composite restorations showed different levels of leakage. Statistical analysis of microleakage scores showed differences only at the enamel margins for nanohybrid material for both layering techniques (p<0.05). The nanohybrid-based resin composite restorations showed better results with the vertical layering technique for enamel margins.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 585
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aranha ACC, 2004, AM J DENT, V17, P99
[2]  
Beznos C, 2001, OPER DENT, V26, P60
[3]   HARDENING SHRINKAGE AND HYGROSCOPIC EXPANSION OF COMPOSITE RESINS [J].
BOWEN, RL ;
RAPSON, JE ;
DICKSON, G .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1982, 61 (05) :654-658
[4]   Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: A systematic review [J].
Braga, RR ;
Ballester, RY ;
Ferracane, JL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (10) :962-970
[5]   Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management [J].
Braga, RR ;
Ferracane, JL .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2004, 15 (03) :176-184
[6]  
Coli P, 1993, Quintessence Int, V24, P583
[7]   Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives [J].
Davidson, CL ;
Feilzer, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (06) :435-440
[8]   Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage [J].
Dennison, JB ;
Yaman, P ;
Seir, R ;
Hamilton, JC .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (05) :499-505
[9]   POSTERIOR COMPOSITE CLASS-II RESTORATIONS - INVITRO COMPARISON OF PREPARATION DESIGNS AND RESTORATION TECHNIQUES [J].
DONLY, KJ ;
WILD, TW ;
JENSEN, ME .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1990, 6 (02) :88-93
[10]  
Duarte S, 2007, QUINTESSENCE INT, V38, P829