Differences Between MRI- and CT-Based Delineation of Target Volume and Organs at Risk in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Cervix

被引:2
作者
Ramya, Rangarajan [1 ]
Saravanan, S. [1 ]
Vijayalakshmi, J. [1 ]
Kumari, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Royapettah Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2B Maan Sarovar Kalpana Apartments,37 Hosp Rd, Chennai 600015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
HDR brachytherapy; Cervical cancer; CT planning; MRI planning; CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY; PELVIC IRRADIATION; RADIATION; TRIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s40944-019-0310-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
AimWith superior soft tissue imaging characteristics, MRI is better than CT in determining the local disease extent during intracavitary brachytherapy of carcinoma cervix. The aim of the study is to evaluate the differences in dimensions and volumes of the target and organs at risk and the subsequent changes in dosimetry between MRI- and CT-based plans.Methods and MaterialsMRI and CT datasets of 34 locally advanced cervical cancer patients taken up for intracavitary brachytherapy between January and September 2017 were analyzed. The target volumes and organs at risk, namely bladder, rectum and sigmoid, were contoured by the same radiation oncologist on both the MRI and CT images as per the GEC ESTRO guidelines. The dimensions of HRCTV, the dose volume parameters of the target and OAR were recorded for the CT and MRI plans. ResultsCT image significantly overestimated the width (p=0.000) and thickness (p=0.009) of HRCTV. The volumes of HRCTV (p=0.000) and IRCTV (p=0.041) were larger with CT image compared to MRI. There was no statistically significant difference between rectal (p=0.107) and sigmoid (p=0.365) volumes on CT and MRI. There was statistically significant difference (all p<0.05) between the dose received by 100%, 98%, 90% and 50% (D100, D98, D90 and D50, respectively) of HRCTV and IRCTV on CT and MRI. There was statistically significant difference (all p<0.05) in the dose delivered to the bladder. However, there was no statistically significant difference (all p>0.05) in the dose received by rectum and sigmoid on CT and MR plans. ConclusionMRI-based brachytherapy planning has shown considerable improvements in tumor control and reductions in normal tissue toxicity. However, the high cost of MRI and non-availability of MRI preclude its use in many centers. CT, on the other hand, is widely available, but it can lead to overestimation of the target, at the time of brachytherapy. Hence, it is important to identify the subset of patients who will benefit from MRI-based planning at the time of brachytherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01 [J].
Eifel, PJ ;
Winter, K ;
Morris, M ;
Levenback, C ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Cooper, J ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, D ;
Mutch, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) :872-880
[2]   Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Target and Normal Tissue Contouring [J].
Eskander, Ramez N. ;
Scanderbeg, Daniel ;
Saenz, Cheryl C. ;
Brown, Michelle ;
Yashar, Catherine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (01) :47-53
[3]   ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN CT ( plus PREBT MRI) AND MRI BASED HRCTV DELINEATION IN CERVIX CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
Federico, M. ;
Fotina, I. ;
Hegazy, N. ;
Kirisits, C. ;
Sturdza, A. ;
Georg, D. ;
Poetter, R. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 :S57-S57
[4]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group* (I):: concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV [J].
Haie-Meder, C ;
Pötter, R ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Briot, E ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimopoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Hellebust, TP ;
Kirisits, C ;
Lang, SF ;
Muschitz, S ;
Nevinson, J ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Wachter-Gerstner, N .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (03) :235-245
[5]   Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation-ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and Interobserver variability [J].
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Snyder, Bradley ;
Reinhold, Caroline ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Woodward, Paula J. ;
Pannu, Harpreet K. ;
Amendola, Marco ;
Mitchell, Donald G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (02) :491-498
[6]  
Hrycushko B, 2014, ABSTR BRACHYTHERAPY, V13, pS88, DOI [10.1016/j.brachy.2014.02.362, DOI 10.1016/J.BRACHY.2014.02.362]
[7]  
*INT COMM RAD UN M, 1985, DOS VOL SPEC REP INT, V38
[8]   CT or MRI for Image-based Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer [J].
Krishnatry, Rahul ;
Patel, Firuza D. ;
Singh, Paramjeet ;
Sharma, Suresh C. ;
Oinam, Arun S. ;
Shukla, Arvind K. .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 42 (04) :309-313
[9]   Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study [J].
Lanciano, R ;
Calkins, A ;
Bundy, BN ;
Parham, G ;
Lucci, JA ;
Moore, DH ;
Monk, BJ ;
O'Connor, DM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8289-8295
[10]   MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer from a Nordic perspective [J].
Lindegaard, Jacob Christian ;
Fokdal, Lars Ulrik ;
Nielsen, Soren Kynde ;
Juul-Christensen, Jens ;
Tanderup, Kari .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2013, 52 (07) :1510-1519