ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0

被引:38
作者
Glogovac, Maja [1 ]
Ruso, Jelena [1 ]
Maricic, Milica [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Qual Management & Standardizat, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Operat Res & Stat, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Quality; maturity level; ISO; 9004; 2018; structural equation modelling; conceptual model; quality management system roadmap;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2020.1865793
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
It is believed that Industry 4.0., as an integration of business and technologies, can significantly improve companies' process performances and their innovation. However, most companies are not aware or not capable of assessing their Industry 4.0 maturity level. Since many considerations on Industry 4.0 successfulness include elements of the quality management system, ISO 9004:2018 guidance for achieving sustained success is considered in this paper as a possible basis for assessment of maturity level of quality in Industry 4.0, framed as Quality 4.0. The questionnaire with a sample size of 335 companies is used to explore the topic. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to verify the ISO 9004:2018 model potential to be used for assessing Quality 4.0 maturity level. Results show that the Context of an organisation positively impacts the Identity of an organisation and Leadership. Therewithal, the Identity of an organisation is recognised to be a positive influencing predictor of Leadership that is proved to be a positive predictor of Process management and Resource management. Furthermore, Resource management is proved to have a positive impact on Performance analysis and evaluation as well on Improvement, learning and innovation construct. The findings indicate the model is usable in the context of Quality 4.0. Such a model could be utilised as a basis for developing a sustainable Quality 4.0 system roadmap.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 547
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]   Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0 [J].
Penumuru, Durga Prasad ;
Muthuswamy, Sreekumar ;
Karumbu, Premkumar .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31 (05) :1229-1241
[52]   Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm [J].
Pereira, T. ;
Barreto, L. ;
Amaral, A. .
MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2017 (MESIC 2017), 2017, 13 :1253-1260
[53]   A METAANALYSIS OF CRONBACH COEFFICIENT-ALPHA [J].
PETERSON, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (02) :381-391
[54]   Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Piccarozzi, Michela ;
Aquilani, Barbara ;
Gatti, Corrado .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
[55]  
Porter ME, 2014, HARVARD BUS REV, V92, P64
[56]   Maturity Models for Information Systems - A State of the Art [J].
Proenca, Diogo ;
Borbinha, Jose .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT/INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, CENTERIS/PROJMAN / HCIST 2016, 2016, 100 :1042-1049
[57]  
Ramani SV, 2017, QUAL MARK RES, V20, P208, DOI 10.1108/QMR-01-2017-0034
[58]   Maturity analysis of manufacturing cells [J].
Rampasso, Izabela S. ;
Anholon, Rosley ;
da Silva, Dirceu ;
Ordonez, Robert E. C. ;
Quelhas, Osvaldo L. G. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (15) :1250-1264
[59]   Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review [J].
Saucedo-Martinez, Jania Astrid ;
Perez-Lara, Magdiel ;
Marmolejo-Saucedo, Jose Antonio ;
Salais-Fierro, Tomas Eloy ;
Vasant, Pandian .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2018, 9 (03) :789-801
[60]   Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review [J].
Schreiber, James B. ;
Nora, Amaury ;
Stage, Frances K. ;
Barlow, Elizabeth A. ;
King, Jamie .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 99 (06) :323-337