ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0

被引:38
作者
Glogovac, Maja [1 ]
Ruso, Jelena [1 ]
Maricic, Milica [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Qual Management & Standardizat, Belgrade, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Operat Res & Stat, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; Quality; maturity level; ISO; 9004; 2018; structural equation modelling; conceptual model; quality management system roadmap;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2020.1865793
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
It is believed that Industry 4.0., as an integration of business and technologies, can significantly improve companies' process performances and their innovation. However, most companies are not aware or not capable of assessing their Industry 4.0 maturity level. Since many considerations on Industry 4.0 successfulness include elements of the quality management system, ISO 9004:2018 guidance for achieving sustained success is considered in this paper as a possible basis for assessment of maturity level of quality in Industry 4.0, framed as Quality 4.0. The questionnaire with a sample size of 335 companies is used to explore the topic. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to verify the ISO 9004:2018 model potential to be used for assessing Quality 4.0 maturity level. Results show that the Context of an organisation positively impacts the Identity of an organisation and Leadership. Therewithal, the Identity of an organisation is recognised to be a positive influencing predictor of Leadership that is proved to be a positive predictor of Process management and Resource management. Furthermore, Resource management is proved to have a positive impact on Performance analysis and evaluation as well on Improvement, learning and innovation construct. The findings indicate the model is usable in the context of Quality 4.0. Such a model could be utilised as a basis for developing a sustainable Quality 4.0 system roadmap.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 547
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Procedure for defining the system of objectives in the initial phase of an industry 4.0 project focusing on intelligent quality control systems
    Albers, Albert
    Gladysz, Bartosz
    Pinner, Tobias
    Butenko, Viktoriia
    Stuermlinger, Tobias
    [J]. SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHANGEABLE, AGILE, RECONFIGURABLE AND VIRTUAL PRODUCTION (CARV2016), 2016, 52 : 262 - 267
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1951, Psychometrika, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
  • [3] Are QM models aligned with Industry 4.0? A perspective on current practices
    Asif, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 258
  • [4] Mapping the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0 to hard and soft total quality management
    Babatunde, Oluwayomi Kayode
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2021, 33 (04) : 896 - 914
  • [5] Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels - case of the defence sector
    Bibby, Lee
    Dehe, Benjamin
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (12) : 1030 - 1043
  • [6] Bogoviz AV, 2019, STUD SYST DECIS CONT, V169, P155, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_15
  • [7] Boys K., 2004, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V21, P841, DOI 10.1108/02656710410551737
  • [8] Back to the future. Is industry 4.0 a new tecno-organizational paradigm? Implications for Latin American countries
    Brixner, Cristian
    Isaak, Paula
    Mochi, Silvina
    Ozono, Maximiliano
    Suarez, Diana
    Yoguel, Gabriel
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 29 (07) : 705 - 719
  • [9] Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world. A systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for further research
    Chiarini, Andrea
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (04) : 603 - 616
  • [10] The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance
    Dalenogare, Lucas Santos
    Benitez, Guilherme Brittes
    Ayala, Nestor Fabian
    Frank, Alejandro German
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 204 : 383 - 394