Measuring general self-efficacy - A comparison of three measures using item response theory

被引:222
作者
Scherbaum, Charles A. [1 ]
Cohen-Charash, Yochi [1 ]
Kern, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baruch Coll, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
general self-efficacy; item response theory; motivation; measurement;
D O I
10.1177/0013164406288171
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
General self-efficacy (GSE), individuals' belief in their ability to perform well in a variety of situations, has been the subject of increasing research attention. However, the psychometric properties (e.g., reliability, validity) associated with the scores on GSE measures have been criticized, which has hindered efforts to further establish the construct of GSE. This study examines the reliability of responses to the items, as well as the item parameters of three GSE measures using item response theory. Contrary to the criticisms, the responses to the items on all three measures of GSE demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties, especially at lower levels of GSE. The results indicate that the New General Self-Efficacy Scale has a slight advantage over the other measures examined in this study in terms of the item discrimination, item information, and relative efficiency of the test information function. Implications for GSE research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1063
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory
    Silvana Ligia Vincenzi Bortolotti
    Rafael Tezza
    Dalton Francisco de Andrade
    Antonio Cezar Bornia
    Afonso Farias de Sousa Júnior
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2013, 47 : 2341 - 2360
  • [32] Examining measures of schizotypy for gender and racial bias using item response theory and differential item functioning
    Spann, Desmond J.
    Cicero, David C.
    Straub, Kelsey T.
    Pellegrini, Amelia M.
    Kerns, John G.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2024, 272 : 120 - 127
  • [33] Validation of Subjective Well-Being Measures Using Item Response Theory
    Al Nimaa, Ali
    Cloninger, Kevin M.
    Persson, Bjorn N.
    Sikstrom, Sverker
    Garcia, Danilo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [34] Environmental management performance for brazilian industrials: measuring with the item response theory
    Trierweiller, Andrea Cristina
    Severo Peixe, Blenio Cesar
    Tezza, Rafael
    Bornia, Antonio Cezar
    de Andrade, Dalton Francisco
    de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 2179 - 2186
  • [35] Self-efficacy and alcohol consumption: Are efficacy measures confounded with motivation?
    St Quinton, Tom
    Morris, Ben
    Lithopoulos, Alexander
    Norman, Paul
    Conner, Mark
    Rhodes, Ryan E. E.
    [J]. COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [36] Measuring environmental management disclosure in industries in Brazil with Item Response Theory
    Trierweiller, Andrea Cristina
    Severo Peixe, Blenio Cezar
    Tezza, Rafael
    Bornia, Antonio Cezar
    Campos, Lucila M. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 47 : 298 - 305
  • [37] Measuring web usability using item response theory: Principles, features and opportunities
    Tezza, Rafael
    Bornia, Antonio Cezar
    de Andrade, Dalton Francisco
    [J]. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2011, 23 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [38] Career decision self-efficacy Item Bank: A Simulation study
    Azpilicueta, Ana E.
    Cupani, Marcos
    Ghio, Fernanda B.
    Moran, Valeria E.
    Garrido, Sebastian J.
    Bruzzone, Manuel
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (31) : 27828 - 27839
  • [39] Career decision self-efficacy Item Bank: A Simulation study
    Ana E. Azpilicueta
    Marcos Cupani
    Fernanda B. Ghío
    Valeria E. Morán
    Sebastián J. Garrido
    Manuel Bruzzone
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 27828 - 27839
  • [40] Using Item Response Theory to Develop Measures of Acquisitive and Protective Self-Monitoring From the Original Self-Monitoring Scale
    Wilmot, Michael P.
    Kostal, Jack W.
    Stillwell, David
    Kosinski, Michal
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2017, 24 (05) : 677 - 691