Risk induced contingency cost modeling for power plant projects

被引:19
作者
Islam, Muhammad Saiful [1 ]
Nepal, Madhav Prasad [2 ]
Skitmore, Martin [2 ]
Drogemuller, Robin [2 ]
机构
[1] Shahjalal Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Built Environm, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
Contingency cost; Cost overruns; Fuzzy set theory; Bayesian belief network; Power plant projects; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; DECISION-MAKING; FUZZY; OVERRUNS; DETERMINANTS; DEVIATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103519
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The current practice of expert judgment-based contingency cost allocation by owners lacks a holistic understanding of project risks, their causal relationships, and impact on project costs. This study presents an integrated fuzzy set theory and fuzzy Bayesian belief network model for a rational, realistic determination of contingency costs for infrastructure projects. The application of the model is demonstrated for real-world power plant projects in Bangladesh. The model has promising results for its ability to establish the amount of contingency costs with a maximum error of 20% between the contingency cost predicted with the model and the actual contingency cost. It has the potential to assist both the owner and contractor to set aside a realistic amount of contingency cost in the preliminary phase of a project. The approach is also equally useful for monitoring and controlling project risks, and dynamically updates the contingency cost amount during project execution.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
A. Government, 2018, GUID NOTE 3A PROB CO
[2]   Cost-risk contingency framework for managing cost overrun in metropolitan projects: using fuzzy-AHP and simulation [J].
Afzal, Farman ;
Shao, Yunfei ;
Junaid, Danish ;
Hanif, Muhammad Shehzad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2020, 13 (05) :1121-1139
[3]  
Ahmed A., 2005, COMPLEX INT, V12, P1
[4]  
Arifuzzaman M., 2019, 2019 INT C INN INT I, P1, DOI [10.1109/ 3ICT.2019.8910317, DOI 10.1109/3ICT.2019.8910317]
[5]   Managing the cost overrun risks of hydroelectric dams: An application of reference class forecasting techniques [J].
Awojobi, Omotola ;
Jenkins, Glenn P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 63 :19-32
[6]   Statistical Characteristics of Cost Contingency in Water Infrastructure Projects [J].
Baccarini, David ;
Love, Peter E. D. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (03)
[7]   Cost contingency management [J].
Barraza, Gabriel A. ;
Bueno, Rafael A. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 23 (03) :140-146
[8]   Public management and cost overruns in public projects [J].
Catalao, Francisco Pinheiro ;
Cruz, Carlos Oliveira ;
Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 25 (05) :677-703
[9]   Exogenous determinants of cost deviations and overruns in local infrastructure projects [J].
Catalao, Francisco Pinheiro ;
Cruz, Carlos Oliveira ;
Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (12) :697-711
[10]   The determinants of cost deviations and overruns in transport projects, an endogenous models approach [J].
Catalao, Francisco Pinheiro ;
Cruz, Carlos Oliveira ;
Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 74 :224-238