Combining participatory modelling and citizen science to support volunteer conservation action

被引:66
作者
Gray, Steven [1 ]
Jordan, Rebecca [2 ,3 ]
Crall, Alycia [4 ]
Newman, Greg [5 ]
Hmelo-Silver, Cindy [6 ]
Huang, Joey [6 ]
Novak, Whitney [6 ]
Mellor, David [7 ]
Frensley, Troy [4 ]
Prysby, Michelle [4 ]
Singer, Alison [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Community Sustainabil, Nat Resource Bldg,480 Wilson Rd,Room 151, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Human Ecol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Nat Resources, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[4] Virginia Polytech Univ, Dept Forest Resources & Environm Conservat, Virginia Cooperat Extens, 460 Stagecoach Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22902 USA
[5] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[6] Indiana Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Counseling & Educ Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[7] Ctr Open Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Participatory modelling; Citizen science; Fuzzy cognitive mapping; Public participation in scientific research (PPSR); TOOL; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.037
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The popularity of both citizen science and participatory modelling has given way to a growing number of case studies that all outline the benefits of more inclusive forms of conservation planning. Citizen science offers volunteers the opportunity to engage in environmental research while participatory modelling engages individuals in community-level environmental decision-making. Although both of these public-science collaborations are often said to lead to improved environmental decision-making, evidence for these outcomes in the peer reviewed literature remains sparse. We suggest that combining these fields has promise for developing community-supported research leading to conservation action. To demonstrate this approach, we present the infrastructure and use of a participatory modelling software called Mental Modeler (http://www.mentalmodeler.org/), used with a citizen science web portal (www.citsci.org) that allows citizen scientists, scientists, and managers to: (1) collaboratively define local conservation issues of shared concern; (2) model and represent assumptions, evidence, and existing information about these issues; (3) run scenarios to discuss potential research or management options; and ultimately (4) co-develop citizen scientific research and conservation plans. Using case study data from two community groups working on locally-defined issues related to land management practices in the US, we demonstrate how coordinated learning through modelling practices can lead to the development of self-organized and co-created conservation action. We conclude that the development of online modelling tools holds strong promise for the fields of both citizen science and conservation biology. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 86
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. GROUP'05. Sanibel Island, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1099203.1099205, 10.1145/1099203.1099205]
[2]  
Blanton B., 2014, VIRGINIA MASTER NATU
[3]  
Bonney R., 2009, A CAISE Inquiry Group Report
[4]   A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities [J].
Conrad, Cathy C. ;
Hilchey, Krista G. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 176 (1-4) :273-291
[5]  
Cooper CB, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
[6]   Citizen Science: A Tool for Integrating Studies of Human and Natural Systems [J].
Crain, Rhiannon ;
Cooper, Caren ;
Dickinson, Janis L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 39, 2014, 39 :641-665
[7]  
Duespohl M., 2012, J SUSTAIN DEV, V5, P1, DOI [10.5539/jsd.v5n12p1, DOI 10.5539/JSD.V5N12P1]
[8]  
Gray S., 2014, P 7 INT C ENV MOD SO, P15
[9]  
Gray S.A., 2014, FUZZY COGNITIVE MAPS, P29, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39739-42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-39739-4_2]
[10]  
Gray SA., 2012, Democracy and Education, V20, P14, DOI DOI 10.1093/PUBMED/FDS015