Interference-fit joining of Cu-SS composite tubes by electromagnetic crimping for different surface profiles

被引:11
作者
Kumar, Deepak [1 ]
Kore, Sachin D. [2 ]
Nandy, Arup [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Gauhati 781039, Assam, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Sch Mech Sci, Ponda 403401, Goa, India
关键词
Electromagnetic crimping (EMC); Interference-fit joint; Joining by forming; Destructive testing; Cu-SS; Composite tubes;
D O I
10.1007/s40194-021-01081-8
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
This paper explores the possibility of producing an improved interference-fit tubular joint between pure copper and stainless steel tube by electromagnetic crimping (EMC). Successful joints are obtained with optimal parameters consisting of the outer surface profile of the inner tube and discharge energy. Joints exceeding the strength of the parent tube are formed without any metallic bond formation. Three destructive testings, namely, pull-out, compression and torsion tests, have confirmed the successful joint formation as the failure occurs in the copper base tube. Analysis of failure mechanisms has revealed joint behaviour at various discharge energies and surface profiles. Among smooth, knurled and threaded surface profiles with different discharge energy levels, knurled surface provides best joint strength at 6.2 kJ, which has shown a failure in the parent Cu tube during all three destructive testings. Radial deformation of the tubes is measured and compared for different discharge energy and surface profile. No metallic bond formation and the wavy interface are observed between the joining partners during microstructural analysis. Furthermore, no elemental overlapping is observed during energy dispersive spectroscopy mapping analysis indicating an absence of diffusion. Higher micro-hardness is observed near the Cu-SS tubular joint interface due to strain hardening caused by high-velocity impact.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1050
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Abdulhadi, 2019, TOOL FAILURE CASTING, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10483-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10483-7]
  • [2] Aizawa T, 2007, WELD J, V86, p119S
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, DOI DOI 10.1520/F2792-12A
  • [4] 3D Simulation of magnetic field distribution in electromagnetic forming systems with field-shaper
    Bahmani, M. A.
    Niayesh, K.
    Karimi, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 209 (05) : 2295 - 2301
  • [5] Belyy I.V., 1977, ELECTROMAGNETIC META
  • [6] De Waele W., 2017, INT J SUSTAIN CONSTR, DOI DOI 10.21825/SCAD.V8I1.6811
  • [7] Dixit, 2021, RECENT ADV MECH ENG, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-7711-6_11, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-7711-6_11]
  • [8] Eguia I., 2004, ICHSF 2004 - 1st International Conference on High-Speed Forming, P161
  • [9] Faes K., 2014, High Speed Forming, P39
  • [10] Plastic deformation behavior of bi-metal tubes during magnetic pulse cladding: FE analysis and experiments
    Fan, Zhisong
    Yu, Haiping
    Li, Chunfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 229 : 230 - 243