Technology optimization of wet flue gas desulfurization process

被引:38
|
作者
Hrastel, Iztok
Gerbec, Marko
Stergarsek, Andrej
机构
[1] Jozef Stefan Inst, Dept Inorgan Chem & Technol, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Esotech DD, Velenje, Slovenia
关键词
desulfurization; flue gas; limestone; process optimization;
D O I
10.1002/ceat.200600314
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Optimization of the wet limestone (calcite) flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process is described, with the focus on the layout of subprocesses and equipment. The aim of optimization was to check the effectiveness and reliability of alternative layouts, involving intermediate product (gypsum) storage in the absorber make-up tank, instant production of limestone slurry from powder in a wet screw conveyer and automatic gypsum dewatering line operation. Three alternatives, standard layout, optimized layout and optimized layout without reheating of treated gas, were designed and tested in a small industrial FGD plant. The comparison included evaluation of desulfurization efficiency, economical feasibility (considering a 125 MW power plant) and reliability of operation. The efficiency of the system was not affected by the layouts. Investment costs were reduced by 5 and 15 % for alternatives I and 2, respectively, compared to standard offers on the market. With respect to operating costs, variable operating and maintenance costs could be decreased by 0.5 up to 2.5 %, respectively. As shown by risk and reliability analysis, the availability of the system in both alternative layouts remained unchanged or was better with regard to the standard layout.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 233
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intensifying effects of zinc oxide wet flue gas desulfurization process with citric acid
    Gao, Li
    Li, Yuan
    He, Jun
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [2] Research progress of wet process synergistic desulfurization and decarbonization technology for coal-fired flue gas
    Gao F.
    Liu Y.
    Zhang G.
    Qin F.
    Yao J.
    Jin H.
    Shi J.
    Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43 (05): : 2324 - 2342
  • [3] Optimization of Limestone-gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System
    Han, Jing
    Zhu, Guoyue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY (ICREET 2016), 2017, 112 : 71 - 73
  • [4] Modeling of Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process for Utilization of Low-Grade Limestone
    Lim, Jonghun
    Choi, Yeongryeol
    Kim, Geonyeol
    Song, Hojun
    Kim, Junghwan
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2019, 57 (05): : 743 - 748
  • [5] Hybrid modeling and operating optimization method of oxidation process of wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) system
    Zhao, Zhongyang
    Fan, Haidong
    Li, Qinwu
    Liu, Chang
    Chen, Zhu
    Li, Lianming
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Gao, Xiang
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 188 : 406 - 416
  • [6] An investigation on data mining and operating optimization for wet flue gas desulfurization systems
    Qiao, Zongliang
    Wang, Xingchao
    Gu, Hui
    Tang, Youfei
    Si, Fengqi
    Romero, Carlos E.
    Yao, XueZhong
    FUEL, 2019, 258
  • [7] Dissolution rate of magnesium hydrate for wet flue gas desulfurization
    Guo, Rui-tang
    Pan, Wei-guo
    Zhang, Xiao-bo
    Xu, Hong-jian
    Ren, Jian-xing
    FUEL, 2011, 90 (01) : 7 - 10
  • [8] Catalytic oxidation of calcium bisulfite in the wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization process
    Lancia, A
    Musmarra, D
    Prisciandaro, M
    Tammaro, M
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1999, 54 (15-16) : 3019 - 3026
  • [9] Modeling of the wet flue gas desulfurization system to utilize low-grade limestone
    Jonghun Lim
    Yeongryeol Choi
    Geonyeol Kim
    Junghwan Kim
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 37 : 2085 - 2093
  • [10] Modeling of the wet flue gas desulfurization system to utilize low-grade limestone
    Lim, Jonghun
    Choi, Yeongryeol
    Kim, Geonyeol
    Kim, Junghwan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 37 (12) : 2085 - 2093